Results 721 - 740 of 1275
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: srbaegon Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
721 | Dear Forum, can you verify my research? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 134121 | ||
Hello survivor, You better check your local dictionary. From the American Heritage Dictionary: diĀ·vine adj. 1. a. Having the nature of or being a deity. b. Of, relating to, emanating from, or being the expression of a deity. c. Being in the service or worship of a deity; sacred. 2. Superhuman; godlike. 3. a. Supremely good or beautiful; magnificent. b. Extremely pleasant; delightful. 4. Heavenly; perfect. All of these fit the Lord Jesus Christ including 1.a. Steve |
||||||
722 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137537 | ||
Hello STTIL, There is no such thing as a Biblical Unitarian. There are only Unitarians who misuse the Bible. Just FYI. Steve |
||||||
723 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137574 | ||
Hello STTIL, Just for clarification, are you saying that the New Testament was translated into Greek as well? Steve |
||||||
724 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137602 | ||
Hello STTIL, Thank you for the response. I must say, however, that your take on the Scriptures places you squarely within the Gnostic camp that you claim to avoid. Steve |
||||||
725 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137603 | ||
Hi Doc, I know. That's why I brought it up. :-) Steve |
||||||
726 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137609 | ||
Hello STTIL, Simply because you believe that what I have is tainted and what you have is not. You were communicating without Colin (flinkywood) about this, but you seemed completely unable to tell him what the "Word of God" was that you had which guided you. The combination of elitism and mysticism puts you in that camp. Steve |
||||||
727 | Does the Father have a God? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 137619 | ||
Hello STTIL, You said there was a good chance that English translations had gnostic influence, therefore what I have is tainted. It is unreliable. On the other hand, you do not believe that what you have for Scripture is tainted. Therefore, you are espousing elitism. You have already espoused mysticism by appealing to the mystery of whether we have proper translations, i.e. we can't know, so we must go by our personal experience. You again state that the "Word of God" guides you. Yet you have still not defined what that is. Still waiting. Steve |
||||||
728 | how do John 1:1-2 and John 1:14 relate | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 153342 | ||
Hello lovetotalk, You said: "If you read John 1:1 in the greek language, as it was written, it would say '...the Word was god.'" More correctly, it would say '...THEWORDOFGOD.'" But let's not quibble about bits. You are in violation of the forum rules of conduct in denying that Jesus is God in the flesh. You will cease and desist. Steve |
||||||
729 | Gospels are OT books? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 211646 | ||
Hello MJH, Whether or not Tim Hegg is evasive, he is definitely wrong. For instance, writing on Acts 15 he states: The "issue" at hand was whether or not someone who was not a Jew could be saved. To put it another way, how could a Gentile become a covenant member with Israel and share in the blessings of the covenant? The prevailing belief of the Judaisms [sic] in Paul's day was that only Jews had a place in the world to come since God had made the covenant of blessing with Israel and no other nation. (Tim Hegg, "Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council," TorahResource, 2008) Here are just two misstatements in just this one paragraph: 1) There was never a question of whether Gentiles could become Christians. That had been answered Acts 11:1-8. 2) Hegg qoutes 15:1-2 to begin the article but completely ignores the actual point being made which is given in 15:5 "But some believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees rose up and said, 'It is necessary to circumcise them and to order them to keep the law of Moses.'" They wanted the Gentile believers to keep the Mosaic Law which Gentiles were never asked to keep. Steve |
||||||
730 | Gospels are OT books? | John 1:1 | srbaegon | 211673 | ||
Hello MJH, Yes, Sanders and Wright have written extensively on this as has Dunn and others. I have read one of Wright's books. He regards Judeo-Christian history as little more than an exercise in religious philosophy. No wonder he gets it wrong. Steve |
||||||
731 | what is the darkness | John 1:5 | srbaegon | 187162 | ||
Hello Aslans_Friend, Just a friendly word of direction here. If you desire a response, check the date of the original post before responding. The post you answered is 3.5 years old and will probably not be answered. Steve |
||||||
732 | Cont radiction??? | John 1:14 | srbaegon | 184075 | ||
Hello San Lukas, Better stated--Jesus is both fully God and fully man in one person. Steve |
||||||
733 | Ezekiel 36:26 | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 19612 | ||
I did not forget verse 28. Had the nation of Israel accepted what the Lord was bringing this would have been fulfilled completely. As it is there is a partial fulfillment with the completion yet future. Steve |
||||||
734 | Please answer the question directly. | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 113359 | ||
Hello Tim, Amen to the noticable drop off. Last week I read The Apostolic Tradition by Hippolytus. It was written about 210-220 A.D. I was amazed. Basically, it was describing a Christianized Levitical priesthood. Steve |
||||||
735 | jcsav, Meaning of Jesus silenced them? | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 147151 | ||
Hello jcsav, How did they know that Elisha or the Prophet would baptize? I can't find the Scripture for that. Steve |
||||||
736 | jcsav, Meaning of Jesus silenced them? | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 147160 | ||
Hello jcsav, Certainly, the 1st-century Jews understood baptism. If you "have not figured it out yet," you should not post it as a fact. Perhaps you should have asked those on this forum how the Jews knew about baptism. Steve |
||||||
737 | jcsav, Meaning of Jesus silenced them? | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 147251 | ||
Hello jcsav, The forum guidelines state that answers are to be supported with Scripture. I'm simply asking that you follow the guidelines. If you have not figured something out, then you appear not to have the support required. Steve |
||||||
738 | jcsav, Meaning of Jesus silenced them? | John 3:5 | srbaegon | 147314 | ||
Hello jcsav, You had said in a previous post: "Look back over the Old Testament. It amazes me that they knew that Elisha, or the Prophet. Would indeed baptise." And later you said: "That was the point that I was trying to make with Searcher, and that was, that the Jews understood baptism. I have not figured it out yet, how did they used the Old testament, to figure that out." No where in the thread did you give the Old Testament verses to back your statements. I just looked. Would you please give them? Also, how does Mal 3:3 pertain to this? It says nothing about baptism. Steve |
||||||
739 | When were disciples born again? | John 3:11 | srbaegon | 157035 | ||
Hello CSM, The concept of "born again" (or more correctly "born from above" mentioned in John 3:1-15) is in the Old Testament. Ezekiel 36:25-27 (ESV) I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleannesses, and from all your idols I will cleanse you. And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules. This is why Nicodemus should have known what Jesus was talking about. Steve |
||||||
740 | "Will be";Will God Bring" Future tense | John 3:13 | srbaegon | 138548 | ||
Hello He-man, I see you failed to answer EdB's question. This is typical of one who desires to spread dissension. Are you of that ilk? EdB's exegesis of 1 Pet 3:18-19 was correct. I recommend that you go back and rethink your position. Steve |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ] Next > Last [64] >> |