Results 721 - 740 of 4232
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: kalos Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
721 | Were there 2 or 4 men hung on the cross | Matt 27:38 | kalos | 165354 | ||
Did both or only one of the thieves revile Jesus? 'Matt. 27:44 and Mark 15:32 say they both did. 'Luke 23:39-40 says that the one rebuked the other for his blasphemy. 'Probably at first they both did and then one of them repented, and, while the other was still reviling, rebuked him and asked the Lord to remember him. So he was saved. Luke doesn't say that the rebuking one had not at first been also reviling. It merely records a segment of the conversation. -- MAW '(Once again, we see another "contradiction" which presumes exhaustive accounts -MB)' ____________________ www.rationalchristianity.net/contra7.html#77 |
||||||
722 | After death can saints see whats going o | Ecclesiastes | kalos | 165279 | ||
SDA..."a cult of Christianity" "The Seventh-day Adventist church is, theologically, a cult of Christianity. This is due to the movement's continued promotion of doctrines that are contrary to the gospel and unorthodox in nature." For links to the following websites, go to: www.apologeticsindex.org/s18.html [] 7th Day Adventism - What You Should Know (Contra) The site is operated by pastor J. Mark Martin (Calvary Chapel), who grew up in SDA. It includes clear overviews and refutations of SDA doctrine, audio message (listen via RealAudio, or order the tapes), and a thorough bibliography. J. Mark Martin is senior pastor of Calvary Community Church in Phoenix, a Calvary Chapel. Pastor Mark received a B.A. in theology from Pacific Union College in Angwin, California and for six years pastored in the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In 1982, the Adventist Church became indignant as Mark began to teach God's grace and he was forced to resign and was ostracized from the church. J. Mark Martin's Bio [] The Ellen G. White Web Site (Contra) "Investigating the claims of SDA prophet Ellen G. White" Extensive collection of research materials. [] Examination of Seventh-day Adventism and Ellen G. White (Contra) 2200 plus pages [] Former Adventist Fellowship Online (Contra) "A place for former Adventists who have found Jesus to be their true Sabbath rest." Includes a web-based discussion forum. [] Life Assurance Ministries (Contra) Former Seventh-day Adventists pastor Dale Ratzlaf reveals the hidden errors of Adventism. The site primarily describes Dale's two books, "Sabbath in Crisis," and "The Cultic Doctrine of Seventh-day Adventists." [] SDA Anonymous A site... ...run by former SDAs who are neither highly supportive nor totally critical and rejecting of everything from SDAism. In others words, just because SDAs teach something does not mean it is wrong. However, everything is open to investigation, resulting in the keeping of some things and, in many cases, rejection of others. The main thrust behind this ''SDAnonymous'' website is to serve as a ''transitional ministry'' for both current and former SDA Christians. Why is this ministry necessary? [] Seventh-day Adventists: Christian or Cult? (Contra) A series of articles examining SDA beliefs. Concludes: We cannot accept that Adventism is a Christian Church just because it asserts that it teaches Christian dogma from the Bible. Instead, we must compare Adventism's fundamental doctrines with those long accepted by Christianity When we do so, we are forced to conclude that Adventism distorts the Bible to perpetrate its own religion essentially denying the true Good News of the Bible in order to focus upon its own heretical theology. Is Seventh-day Adventism really Christian? [] The Seventh Day Adventist Church (Contra) Good collection of articles on all aspects of Seventh-day Adventism [] Seventh-day Adventist Church (Pro) The official site. [] What Seventh-day Adventists Need To Know (Contra) "I simply want to supply some important information that has been 'hidden' for a long time by the church and it's hierarchy, some things that you won't hear in the Doug Batchelor's 'Millennium of Prophecy Seminar'." ____________________ www.apologeticsindex.org/s18.html |
||||||
723 | After death can saints see whats going o | Ecclesiastes | kalos | 165268 | ||
'What does the Bible say about soul sleep? 'When the Bible says a person is “sleeping” in relation to death (Luke 8:52; 1 Corinthians 15:6), it does not mean literal “sleep.” Sleeping is just a way to describe death because a dead body appears to be sleeping. The Bible tells us that the instant you die, you are taken to heaven or Hell based on whether you had received Christ as your Savior or not. For believers, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:6-8; Philippians 1:23). For unbelievers, death means everlasting punishment in Hell (Luke 16:22-23). The concept of “soul sleep” is not a Biblical doctrine. The moment we die, we face the judgment of God (Hebrews 9:27). Until the resurrection, though, there is currently a temporary heaven “Paradise” (Luke 23:43; 2 Corinthians 12:4) and Hell “Hades” (Revelation 1:18; 20:13-14). 'In a sense, a person’s body is “sleeping” while their soul is in Paradise or Hades. This body is then “awoken” and transformed into the eternal body a person will possess for eternity. These eternal bodies are what we possess for all of eternity, whether we are in heaven or Hell. Those who were in Paradise will be sent to the New Heavens and New Earth (Revelation 21:1). Those who were in Hades will be thrown into the lake of fire. (Revelation 20:11-15). These are the final, eternal destinations of all people - based entirely on whether a person had trusted Jesus Christ alone for the salvation of their sins.' ____________________ www.gotquestions.org/soul-sleep.html |
||||||
724 | After death can saints see whats going o | Ecclesiastes | kalos | 165265 | ||
The Soul is Conscious After Death Revelation 6:9-11 "And when He broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; and they cried out with a loud voice, saying, 'How long, O Lord, holy and true, wilt Thou refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?' And there was given to each of them a white robe; and they were told that they should rest for a while longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be killed even as they had been, should be completed also." Obviously a person's soul is more than his breath. These robed souls under the altar, crying out to God, are not "breaths." Note that these souls are conscious after death. They were martyred and after death are very much alive in Heaven. They have the ability to cry out to God and to wear white robes. God Himself tells them that more of their brethren will join them after they are killed. Again in Revelation 20:4 "And I saw thrones; and they sat upon them, and judgement was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of the testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshipped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years." Additional Scriptures Indicating the Consciousness of the Soul after Death Job 26:5-6 Matthew 22:31, 32 Luke 16:19-31 1 Thessalonians 5:10 Isaiah 14:9-11; 15-17 When the Soul Leaves the Body, the Body Sleeps The term "sleep" is never applied to the soul or the spirit, but only the body. The soul and the spirit continue to exist after death. The body "sleeps" and goes back to dust. ____________________ (www.sdaoutreach.org/dead.html) |
||||||
725 | Does anyone know whrn the beginning was? | Gen 1:31 | kalos | 165230 | ||
'What is the Gap Theory? 'Did anything happen in between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2? 'The Gap Theory is the view that there was a vast period of time between when God created the earth and when He created life on the earth. I find it amazing how much some Bible teachers try to fit between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Some try to fit millions of years of history, the dinosaurs, another race of humans that fell and became Satan and the demons, etc., etc. – all in between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Don’t you think that if something important had occurred between the two verses God would have told us so? I do not think God wants us to have to speculate about such important events. 'What took place between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2? Absolutely nothing! Genesis 1:1 tells us that God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:2 informs us that when He first created the earth, it was formless, empty, and dark. The rest of Genesis chapter 1 tells us how God “rectified” the formless, empty, and dark earth – filling it with life, beauty, and goodness.' |
||||||
726 | Does anyone know whrn the beginning was? | Gen 1:31 | kalos | 165229 | ||
Dake's Annotated Reference Bible 'The above research only scratches the surface of the heresy that is contained within the pages of the Dake Bible. Dake's view of Jesus, from His teaching of the preincarnate nature of Christ to his teaching of Christ Incarnate, is filled with contradictions, confusion, and doctrinal chaos. The Jesus of the Dake Annotated Reference Bible is demonstrably not the Jesus of the Bible. What makes this so troubling is that Dake and his aberrant teachings are accepted within the confines of the orthodox Christian community. 'In fact, never have I seen so much heresy contained in the teaching of one man, and that man still be considered Christian. The reason for this is either ignorance of what Finis Jennings Dake actually taught or a church that is so biblically illiterate that it cannot tell Living Water from deadly poison. 'If more believers were informed about Dake's heresies regarding such topics as the nature of God, the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the deity of Christ, then the Dake Annotated Reference Bible would quickly fall off of the best-seller chart and into a place where it belongs—the garbage bin, alongside other best-selling editions that promote principles that can be at home only in the kingdom of the cults. It is my desire to be a voice used by the Lord to help accomplish this feat...' To read more go to: www.apologeticsindex.org/d47.html The Jesus Of The Dake Annotated Reference Bible by Jeff Spancer |
||||||
727 | "the law is spiritual, but I am carnal" | Rom 7:14 | kalos | 165197 | ||
NASB Psalm 1:2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD, And in His law he meditates day and night. AMPLIFIED Psalm 1:2 But his delight and desire are in the law of the Lord, and on His law (the precepts, the instructions, the teachings of God) he habitually meditates (ponders and studies) by day and by night. [Rom. 13:8-10; Gal. 3:1-29; II Tim. 3:16.] |
||||||
728 | "the law is spiritual, but I am carnal" | Rom 7:14 | kalos | 165162 | ||
God's laws were NOT nailed to the cross The "Handwriting of Requirements" ____________________ "Some commentators have erred in saying that God's laws have been against us and were nailed to the cross." ____________________ Col 2:14 Good News Translation he canceled the unfavorable record of our debts with its binding rules and did away with it completely by nailing it to the cross. Col. 2:14 Holman Christian Standard Bible He erased the certificate of debt, with its obligations, that was against us and opposed to us, and has taken it out of the way by nailing it to the cross. 'Christ "wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us...having nailed it to the cross" (Colossians 2:14, NKJ). What kind of requirements are being discussed? 'The Greek word for "handwriting" is cheirographon, used in common Greek for a document written in one's own hand as legal proof of indebtedness. Some modern translations call it a bond of indebtedness. 'Christ wiped out a note of debt. What kind of debts did Christ cancel? He canceled our spiritual debts, our sins, our transgressions of God's law, and this is what the note of debt refers to. In his crucifixion, Christ symbolically nailed our note of debt to his cross because his sacrifice paid our debts. 1 Peter 2:24 uses a similar analogy. 'The Greek word for "requirements" (KJV "ordinances") is dogmasin, a form of the word dogma, which is used only five times in the New Testament. Dogma can refer to decrees of Caesar (Luke 2:1, Acts 17:7) or apostolic decrees (Acts 16:4). In other writings of that era, dogma could also refer to the commandments of God (3 Maccabees 1:3, Josephus, Against Apion 1, 42) or the commandments of Jesus (Barnabas 1:6, Ignatius to the Magnesians 13:1). 'Commentators generally agree that dogma in Colossians 2:14 refers to God's laws. That makes the most sense in the context, because our spiritual debts have come from breaking God's laws. However, some commentators have erred in saying that God's laws have been against us and were nailed to the cross. 'The meaning becomes more clear if we notice that cheirographon is singular and dogmasin is plural. It is the cheirographon, the note of debt, that "was [singular] against us, which was [singular] contrary to us. And He has taken it [singular] out of the way, having nailed it [singular] to the cross." The last part of verse 14 is about the handwriting, not the requirements. 'God's laws are not against us. It is the note of debt, our sin, that has been against us. The validity of the laws is not in question here; the fact that we incur a debt if we fail to keep the requirements implies that Paul is refering to laws that are valid.' Michael Morrison ____________________ www.wcg.org/lit/bible/epis/Col214.htm Col 2:14 |
||||||
729 | explain the doctrine of predistination | Rom 9:13 | kalos | 165128 | ||
Jeff: You're welcome. I had not read Doc's explanation before I posted my Note. All I have to do is randomly flip through an English dictionary and I see lots of English words whose meaning I do not know. Years ago I believe I heard there are 600,000 words in the English language. The average person's vocabulary (including mine) is much smaller than that. :-) Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
730 | explain the doctrine of predistination | Rom 9:13 | kalos | 165114 | ||
When one uses the word "sic" in parentheses it indicates that what is being quoted is being quoted word for word for word exactly as it appears as originally written. (Sic) means nothing has been changed; this is exactly what the original says. I wonder, if "sic" is merely a Latin word, why is it listed and defined in a dictionary of the English language? If it is merely a Latin word, one would think the definition would be found only in a Latin dictionary. No offense and nothing personal intended, Jeff. I appreciate you and your participation in the forum. Grace and peace, Kalos |
||||||
731 | explain the doctrine of predistination | Rom 9:13 | kalos | 165112 | ||
DocTrinsograce: You write: "I don't even come close to being as precise and eloquent as the old divines. I would never have been able to word things as well as they have done. The best I can do for you -- i.e., the very best -- is to point you to that confession." You also write: "Does this mean you are interested in my ability to paraphrase?" Exactly! This is exactly why I so frequently quote various preachers, teachers, and scholars. It's because: - I don't even come close to being as precise and eloquent as they. - I would never have been able to word things as well as they have done. - The best I can do is to point people to the writings of others. - If I try to paraphrase, I might make a mistake and misstate whatever it is I'm talking about. One thing no one needs is more error and confusion regarding Bible questions. There is no point in me trying to reinvent the wheel. And that is why I quote other people. Grace to you, John P.S. I even found it necessary to quote you to explain why I quote others. :-) Thanks for expressing it so well. |
||||||
732 | "the law is spiritual, but I am carnal" | Rom 7:14 | kalos | 165100 | ||
'Many have sought to avoid the obvious by insisting that these verses (Rom 7:13-25) which describe this great conflict within the apostle depict a struggle in the apostle before his conversion. Let me mention several facts which leave no room for this explanation: '(1) The context is one of sanctification, not salvation. What purpose would a description of Paul’s preconversion struggles serve in the context of living out the righteousness of Christ as a Christian? The context demands that Paul’s struggle be the struggle of the saint, trying to live a godly life. '(2) There is a conflict. Conflict and agony over the commission of sin is not the experience of the unbeliever. Paul agrees with the Law; he desires to do what is right and pleasing to God. This is not the desire of the unbeliever. Paul hates the evil which he does. Can this be the case with the unsaved? The only sensible explanation for this struggle is that Paul struggled as a Christian. '(3) The change in tense supports Paul’s struggle as a Christian. When Paul spoke of the way the coming of the Law awakened sin like a sleeping giant in verses 7-11, the tenses of the verbs were past. But in his description of his struggle with sin, they are all present: “… the Law is spiritual, but I am of the flesh …” (Romans 7:14). The only reason for a change in tense is to make it plain that Paul now spoke of his struggle in the matter of sanctification. '(4) Our experience as a Christian corresponds to Paul’s. I have not known of a Christian who has not found real identification with the apostle in the struggle which he describes. Our experience as Christians trying to live godly lives perfectly fits that of Paul in these verses...' To read more go to: Sanctification—Humanly Impossible! (Romans 7) By: Bob Deffinbaugh , Th.M. www.bible.org |
||||||
733 | "the law is spiritual, but I am carnal" | Rom 7:14 | kalos | 165099 | ||
For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin. Romans 7:14 (NKJV) Romans 7:14-25 'Some interpret this chronicle of Paul's inner conflict as describing his life before Christ. They point out that Paul describes the person as "sold under sin"; as having "nothing good" in him; and as a "wretched man" trapped in a "body of death". Those descriptions seem to contradict the way Paul describes the believer in chap. 6. 'However, it is correct to understand Paul here to be speaking about a believer. This person desires to obey God's law and hates his sin; he is humble, recognizing that nothing good dwells in his humanness; he sees sin in himself, but not as all that is there; and he serves Jesus Christ with his mind. Paul has already established that none of those attitudes ever describe the unsaved (compare Romans 1:18-21,32;3:10-20). 'Paul's use of present tense verbs in vv. 14-25 strongly supports the idea that he is describing his life currently as a Christian. For those reasons, it seems certain that chap. 7 describes a believer. 'However, of those who agree that this is a believer, there is still disagreement. Some see a carnal, fleshly Christian; others a legalistic Christian, frustrated by his feeble attempts in his own power to please God by keeping the Mosaic law. But the personal pronoun "I" refers to the apostle Paul, a standard of spiritual health and maturity. 'So in vv.14-25 Paul must be describing all Christians -- even the most spiritual and mature -- who, when they honestly evaluate themselves against the righteous standard of God's law, realize how far short they fall. He does so in a series of 4 laments (vv.14-17,18-20,21-23,24,25). ____________________ The MacArthur Study Bible, Word Publishing, 1997. |
||||||
734 | Context versus what is translated. | 1 Sam 25:22 | kalos | 165059 | ||
Shythiyl: The earliest Old English inscriptions date from the period 450-480 A.D. The Septuagint is a Greek version of the Jewish Scriptures redacted in the 3d and 2d centuries B.C. It is unlikely, therefore, that an English translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) existed before the Septuagint. Grace and peace, Kalos |
||||||
735 | Inspiration of the Spirit. | Matt 11:28 | kalos | 165003 | ||
Hi, Doc Theo! No generalization is worth anything, including the one I made about the ninety-nine percent. :-) Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
736 | Paul had problems? No one acts good? | Matt 11:28 | kalos | 164993 | ||
In a previous thread you posted the following: "I will admit I may disagree with orthodox confessions and theologians. They were not inspired, which leaves the possibility that their interpretation of Scripture is erred at some points. However, I do not think my view of the Bible at present is basically erred." ___________________ "It seems odd, that certain men who talk so much of what the Holy Spirit reveals to themselves, should think so little of what he has revealed to others." ____________________ "In order to be able to expound the Scriptures, and as an aid to your pulpit studies, you will need to be familiar with the commentators: a glorious army, let me tell you, whose acquaintance will be your delight and profit. Of course, you are not such wiseacres as to think or say that you can expound Scripture without assistance from the works of divines and learned men who have labored before you in the field of exposition. If you are of that opinion, pray remain so, for you are not worth the trouble of conversion, and like a little coterie who think with you, would resent the attempt as an insult to your infallibility. It seems odd, that certain men who talk so much of what the Holy Spirit reveals to themselves, should think so little of what he has revealed to others." -- C. H. Spurgeon |
||||||
737 | Inspiration of the Spirit. | Matt 11:28 | kalos | 164991 | ||
Doc: Thanks for your fine post. I wonder if there is one Christian in 100 who properly understands the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit. It seems that 99 percent of Forum members believe that a) the Holy Spirit is giving them new revelation; and/or b) there is ground for "a hyper-individualistic understanding of the Gospel wherein the views of other believers and the gathering of believers together are considered unimportant."* ** Further, if one is confused about the illumination of Scripture by the Holy Spirit, then how does one get the illumination to know that which he alleges to know? Grace to you, Kalos ____________________ *Jewish New Testament Commentary, David H. Stern, Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1992 ** See also ID# 154314. |
||||||
738 | Which day is number seven? | Ex 20:10 | kalos | 164930 | ||
What is Seventh-day Adventism and what do Seventh-day Adventists believe? 'There seem to be different "degrees" of Seventh-day Adventism. Some Seventh-day Adventists believe identically to orthodox Christians, other than believing that worship should be held on Saturday and that the Saturday Sabbath should still be observed. If these are the only differences, then yes, a person could be a Seventh-day Adventist and still be a true believer in the Lord Jesus Christ. 'However, some Seventh-day Adventists believe in much more than a Saturday Sabbath / worship day. Seventh-day Adventists have been known to believe in: the annihilation of the wicked instead of an eternal hell, that believers who die enter a state of soul sleep, and that a person must observe the Saturday Sabbath in order to be saved. Other problems with some Seventh-day Adventists are: belief in Ellen G. White, the founder of Seventh-day Adventism, as a true prophet of God even though many of her "prophecies" failed to come true - and - that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as "prophesied" by Hiram Edson. 'So, What is Seventh-day Adventism and what do Seventh-day Adventists believe? Should a Christian attend a Seventh-day Adventist church? Due to the potential doctrinal issues mentioned above, I would strongly encourage believers to not get involved in Seventh-day Adventism. Yes, a person can be an advocate of Seventh-day Adventism and still be a believer. At the same time, there are enough potential issues to make attending a Seventh-day Adventist church questionable at best.' ____________________ www.gotquestions.org/Seventh-Day-Adventism.html |
||||||
739 | Dake's Annotated Reference Bible | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 164888 | ||
Dake's Annotated Reference Bible 'The above research only scratches the surface of the heresy that is contained within the pages of the Dake Bible. Dake's view of Jesus, from His teaching of the preincarnate nature of Christ to his teaching of Christ Incarnate, is filled with contradictions, confusion, and doctrinal chaos. The Jesus of the Dake Annotated Reference Bible is demonstrably not the Jesus of the Bible. What makes this so troubling is that Dake and his aberrant teachings are accepted within the confines of the orthodox Christian community. 'In fact, never have I seen so much heresy contained in the teaching of one man, and that man still be considered Christian. The reason for this is either ignorance of what Finis Jennings Dake actually taught or a church that is so biblically illiterate that it cannot tell Living Water from deadly poison. 'If more believers were informed about Dake's heresies regarding such topics as the nature of God, the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the deity of Christ, then the Dake Annotated Reference Bible would quickly fall off of the best-seller chart and into a place where it belongs—the garbage bin, alongside other best-selling editions that promote principles that can be at home only in the kingdom of the cults. It is my desire to be a voice used by the Lord to help accomplish this feat...' To read more go to: www.apologeticsindex.org/d47.html The Jesus Of The Dake Annotated Reference Bible by Jeff Spancer |
||||||
740 | Did Jesus experence real temptation? | Heb 4:15 | kalos | 164841 | ||
Could Jesus have sinned? 'If He was not capable of sinning, how could He truly be able to "sympathize with our weaknesses (Heb 4:15)? If He could not sin, what was the point of the temptation?" 'No, Jesus could not have sinned. If He could have sinned He would still be able to sin today because He retains the same essence He did while living on earth. He is the God-Man -- and will forever remain so, having full deity and full humanity so included in one person as to be indivisible. To believe that Jesus could sin is to believe that God could sin. Colossians 1:19 For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell. Colossians 2:9 For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily. 'Although Jesus is fully human He was not born with the same sinful nature that we are born with. He certainly was tempted in the same way we are, in that temptations were put before Him by Satan, yet He remained sinless because God is incapable of sinning. It is against His very nature (Matthew 4:1; Hebrews 2:18, 4:15; James 1:13). Sin is by definition a trespass of the Law. God created the Law and the Law is by nature what God would or would not do. Therefore, sin is anything that God would not do by his very nature. 'To be tempted is not in and of itself sinful. A person could tempt you with something you have no desire to do, such as to smoke crack or participate in a homosexual act. You probably have no desire whatsoever to take part in these actions, but you were still tempted because someone placed the possibility before you. There are at least two definitions for tempted: '1) Tempted - To have a sinful proposition suggested to you by someone or something outside yourself or by your own sin nature. '2) Tempted - To consider actually participating in a sinful act and the possible pleasures and consequences of such act to such a degree that the act is already taking place in your mind. 'The first definition does not describe a sinful act/thought, the second does. When you dwell upon a sinful act and consider how you might be able to bring it to pass you have crossed the line of sin. Jesus was tempted in the fashion of definition 1, except that He was never tempted by a sin nature because it did not exist within Him. Satan proposed certain sinful acts to Jesus but He had no inner desire to participate in the sin. Hence He was tempted like we are but remained sinless. 'Jesus knows what it is like to be tempted but He does not know what it is like to sin. This does not prevent Him from assisting us. We are tempted with sins that are common to man (1 Corinthians 10:13). These sins generally can be boiled down to three different types: the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life (1 John 2:16). Examine the temptation and sin of Eve as well as the temptation of Jesus and you will find that the temptations for each came from these three categories. Jesus was tempted in every way and in every area that we are, but remained perfectly holy. Although our corrupt natures will have the inner desire to participate in some sins we have the ability to "just say no" to sin because we are no longer slaves to sin but rather slaves of God (Romans 6 especially verses 2 and 16-22).' ____________________ www.gotquestions.org/could-Jesus-have-sinned.html |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ] Next > Last [212] >> |