Results 21 - 29 of 29
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: danieln Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | difference Christian and catholic | Acts 11:26 | danieln | 50951 | ||
Hi Emmaus, i think you need to clarify which part of what Jesusman said you beleive is inaccurate. | ||||||
22 | difference Christian and catholic | Acts 11:26 | danieln | 50972 | ||
I agree that we can (and should) forgive each other. Mat 6:14 "If you forgive others the wrongs they have done to you, your Father in heaven will also forgive you. Mat 18:21-22 Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, if my brother keeps on sinning against me, how many times do I have to forgive him? Seven times?" "No, not seven times," answered Jesus, "but seventy times seven, but i do not think we can presume to take the place of God and forgive sins for him. Mark 2:7 "How does he dare talk like this? This is blasphemy! God is the only one who can forgive sins!" in fact you will notice that the two things that are called blasphemous in the NT are forgiveness of sins and saying one is God on ths earth (John 10:33) |
||||||
23 | difference Christian and catholic | Acts 11:26 | danieln | 50973 | ||
Well i looked up the meanings of the two words and i guess you have a point Emmaus. Papal infallibility (R. C. Ch.), the dogma that the pope can not, when acting in his official character of supreme pontiff, err in defining a doctrine of Christian faith or rule of morals, to be held by the church. This was decreed by the Ecumenical Council at the Vatican, July 18, 1870. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. Still i would like to know the reason the pope is considered infallible, surely the bible is our infallible guide to the christain faith and morals |
||||||
24 | further details? | 2 Cor 5:8 | danieln | 58311 | ||
its just that this thought occured to me.. 1) those who sin die Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die. 2) Jesus died for our sins and now we have the hope of the resurrection 1Co 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. 1Co 15:18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. 1Co 15:19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. 1Co 15:20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. 1Co 15:21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 1Co 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 1Co 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. 1Co 15:18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. 1Co 15:19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. 1Co 15:20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. 1Co 15:21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 1Co 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 3) your definition of death is just death of the body(with the eternal soul going to heaven) if we take Jesus out of the equation, then we still have eternal souls going to heaven.. therefore we dont need Jesus this is a disturbing thought. the core of this doctrine seems to lessen our reliance on Jesus besides the scriptures you mentioned 1 Cor 15:12-58 seems to pin all our hope on the resurrection, it says if the dead wont be resurrected then they are perished. 1Co 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. 1Co 15:18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. 1Co 15:32 If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die. also 1 The 4:13-18 has the 2nd Advent and the resurrection as our hope |
||||||
25 | Info on Antichrist and the Rapture | 1 Thessalonians | danieln | 58241 | ||
this rapture isnt all that secret | ||||||
26 | U.S.A. in Bible Prophesy? | Revelation | danieln | 26062 | ||
in those texts God is telling the future events of Israel. what is prophecy but God telling us future events? the passages have everthing to do with prophecy plus: (a). Jews and Christians have used this principle for centuries.(1) (b). The prophecy in Daniel chapter 9 is ridiculous without it.(2) Also, the 490 years of chapter 9 is cut off from the longer period of chapter 8, thus indicating that the day-for-a-year principle must also apply in Daniel 8. (c). In Dan. 8: 13 it says "How long will the vision be…?". This vision of chapter 8 runs from the ram (Medo-Persia) right through to the activities of papal Rome. Therefore the 2300 period must cover Medo-Persia, Greece, Imperial Rome and papal Rome. (d). The prophecy of Daniel chapter 8 starts with Medo-Persia but we are told it relates to the "time of the end". Therefore the 2300 period must certainly be a long period of time to take us to the time of the end.(3) (e). A literal 3 1/2 years does not fit in Daniel 7:25. The kingdom of the horn with eyes and a mouth referred to in this verse is a more significant kingdom in the vision than the empires that reigned before it. All these previous kingdoms lasted for many decades. Also God judges the horn with eyes and a mouth towards the end of earth's history when He gives the dominion to His Son. So it must continue for a long time after the downfall of Imperial Rome. (f). These time periods are characterised by symbolic language. This should point us to considering a day-for-a-year principle as applying. After all, why would one want to use symbolic language unless there was some deeper meaning behind the time period mentioned? (g). The idea of a day standing for a year is relatively common in Scripture. See, for example, Nu.14: 34; Eze. 4: 6; Ge. 29: 27; Le. 25: 3,4.(4) (1). Froom L. E., The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Washington DC, Review and Herald, 1950, vol.1, p. 176, 203. (2). Seventy weeks is literally only about one and a half years. How can this be enough time to accomplish what is in the prophecy? 490 years fits perfectly when we add in the dates for the decree and the Messiah's coming. (3). By studying Daniel 11: 35 and 12: 7-10 along with Daniel 7: 25 we can see that the "time of the end" when Daniel's prophecies would be unsealed started at the end of the 1260 years of persecution ie. 1798. (4). In Le. 25:3,4 the week is used to symbolise a seven-year cycle with the seventh-day Sabbath representing the seventh year of rest. |
||||||
27 | U.S.A. in Bible Prophesy? | Revelation | danieln | 26169 | ||
Hi Tim, How does the prophecy in Daniel 9 obviously tell us to convert days to years? Surely if we apply the "day to a year" rule here we might apply it in Daniel 12. Daniel 9 (NIV minus the notes) 25 "Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven sevens, and sixty-two sevens. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. 26 After the sixty-two sevens, the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. 27 He will confirm a covenant with many for one seven. In the middle of the seven he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing (of the temple) he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him. nothing here tells me that days are converted to years, yet Jesus was baptised 483 years later(seven sevens, and sixty-two sevens.) thanks daniel |
||||||
28 | U.S.A. in Bible Prophesy? | Revelation | danieln | 26171 | ||
hi kalos, since when did a view being different from mainstream make it wrong? Jesus had quite a different view to mainstream Jewish belief in his time. Luthers 'salvation by faith' concept wasnt the most popular idea when he rediscovered it either |
||||||
29 | U.S.A. in Bible Prophesy? | Revelation | danieln | 26178 | ||
Hi kalos no problem i hope i didnt offend you either. | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 ] |