Results 3081 - 3100 of 3447
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Searcher56 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
3081 | living together befor marriage w/out sex | 2 Tim 2:22 | Searcher56 | 162331 | ||
God's day to you, sherrie71467, Romans 13:1ff says we must obey the governing authorities ... and they say we need have some pronounce us married and have a license. Now and then people needed obey the law and customs. Searcher | ||||||
3082 | Trifling, unedifying, stupid controversy | 2 Tim 2:23 | Searcher56 | 96294 | ||
Godman ... Typing in UPPERCASE is YELLING ... and hard for me to read. Please type in lower case. Where did you get 95 percent? The Bereans were young Christians, yet they checked out what was said against Scripture (Acts 17:11). There are beliefs on some minor issues, that one may think is twisted ... yet both sides can prove using Scripture. This fighting is the joy of Satan. |
||||||
3083 | What To Shut Your Mind Against | 2 Tim 2:23 | Searcher56 | 170048 | ||
Scripture ... 1Ti 1:3-11 (v 3), 4:7-8, 6:3-5ff (v 4); 2Ti 2:22-26 (v 23), 4:2-5 (v 4); Tit 3:3-9 (v 9) ... Kalos, You and I both know, and others, know that threads twist and turns ... and even get off subject. For me these verses, and other, mean that there controversies and topics like genealogies which are emphazied but should not because: - they are not God's work 1Ti 1:3 - it doesn't lead to godliness 1Ti 4:7-8 - it causes envy, strife 1Ti 6:4 - it produces quarrels vice kindness 2Ti 2:23-24 - it is the desire of the teacher and some like it 2Ti 2:3 - it is unprofitable and usless vice excellent and profitable Tit 3:8-9 ... so we need to not teach or listen to such junk. S |
||||||
3084 | Paul's extra-biblical teaching inerrant? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 8075 | ||
Lionstrong, what I mean is we know that not everything Paul taught is recorded in Scripture, because we do not have the words he said in Acts. He may of made errors also in the other letters he wrote - we know of at least two missing letters to the Cornithians. So the bottom line is that while what is recorded in the Bible is inerrant, what else he said (or wrote) may not be. If this is not what you are saying (or agree to), plaes let me know. |
||||||
3085 | Paul's teaching: Inerrant or Fallible? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 8130 | ||
You carried it on again. By responding, then saying to stop, means you may of ;ost the rebate. |
||||||
3086 | Paul's extra-biblical teaching inerrant? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 8131 | ||
I say again, we know we do not have all of Paul's sermons and writings recorded. That is what I call extra-biblical. | ||||||
3087 | Paul's extra-biblical teaching inerrant? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 8132 | ||
Someone brought it up. | ||||||
3088 | How do you know if God is talking to you | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 64025 | ||
kelly_blue, you are welcome, again. Remember to check out whatever you hear (see) against Scripture (Acts 17:11). I hope your Sunday School girls cause you to dig into the Word. May you all grow in Him, I pray the words of your mouth and the meditation of your heart is acceptable in our Lord's sight our Rock and our Redeemer (Psa 19:14). Searcher |
||||||
3089 | What is Messianic Bible? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 79156 | ||
The Messianic Authorised Version is a New Edition of the “Authorised Version” of 1611 as published by the Revisers in their “Revised Version” in 1769, commonly known as the “King James Version”. Copyright © 2000 Yeshiva Israel Source: http://www.messianic-bible-society.org/ For more go to their site. |
||||||
3090 | What is Messianic Bible? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 79286 | ||
You are welcome | ||||||
3091 | can we be sure the Bible is valid? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 148908 | ||
Joe, since what Paul wrote is inspired and he wrote "all Scripture" ... I believe it to men that ... not just 2 Timothy, his letters, even the New Testament ... it as all 66 books. Where do you want to begin to use NT text to verify your belief in Christ? What about the prophecies that Jesus Christ fulfilled. Here are a couple of sites to review: http://www.cynet.com/Jesus/prophecy/ntquoted.htm http://mb-soft.com/believe/txh/proph.htm |
||||||
3092 | Bible inerrancy versus author's mistakes | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 186695 | ||
God's day to you, Aslans_Friend, From an old post of mine ... Ahimelech may of been only a priest, for the word "high" is not there (1Sa 21:1). However, from Josuha 20:6 to 2 Kings 12:10, we do not see the phrase "high priest". On the latter, it seems strange that Jehoiada is only a priest and the high priest is not named. Ahimelech may of been retired as high priest and Abiathar, the high priest was not around when David came. We know that Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech (1Sa 22:20, 23:6, 30:7). However, we see Ahimelech is the son of Abiathar (2Sa 8:17, 1Ch 24:6). Either there is another copiest error, or the son is named after his grandfather. ------------------------------------------- Doc wrote ... The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge states, "The most probable opinion seems to be, that both father and son had two names, the father being also called Abiathar; and this appears almost certain from 2 Samuel 8:17; 1 Chronicles 18:16, where Ahimelech seems evidently termed Abiathar, while Abiathar is called Ahimelech or Abimelech. (Cf 1 Kings 2:26, 27.)" Although I'm sure there has been much discussion and speculation since this statement was penned, it sounds reasonable. It probably represents the general concensus, while avoiding problematic conjecture. ------------------------------------------- The orginial has no mistakes ... there are copist mistakes. Searcher |
||||||
3093 | was this a scribe's error? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 187075 | ||
You are welcome | ||||||
3094 | Contradictions in Bible Study | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 232524 | ||
EdB, One of the issues is interpetation. All sides may be on solid ground ... or not. We all can be misinterpreting, even theologians. Sometimes because there is lack of study. The commonly accepted teaching can be wrong. It may be because people accept tradition or let it influence their view. There are texts it is wise to say "I don't know" ... even if one is a theologian/ expert. As I am preparing to teach Revelation, I see all this. We are at Rev 2:18 on Sunday, after 16-17 lessons. I always prefer to chew on Scripture without looking at what others say. Searcher |
||||||
3095 | Preach the Word | 2 Tim 4:2 | Searcher56 | 239268 | ||
Greetings Doc, Why to "preachers" TALK about a portion of Scripture with no meat ... or just try to tickle the ears? Methinks some do for their own self and wanting a higher position in the denomination. They even do TOO MANY things outside the church. I am talking about my pastor. |
||||||
3096 | I've sinned,can't pay no more, repented | Titus 1:6 | Searcher56 | 69741 | ||
Read Titus 1:6 ... You must be "the husband of one wife" and if you have another woman, even just for a night, one no longer has one wife. This cannot be undone. People has said if the relationship ties are cut, it is undone. But, that is not Biblical. It is true for being above reproach. Our past acts as a Christian should not be problimatic. |
||||||
3097 | Kids unsaved means no pastorate? | Titus 1:6 | Searcher56 | 157116 | ||
Makarios, God's day to you, my friend. I think your mother-in-law did well by saying no. While I may have been qualified to be a deacon, I thought the fact that I was single was a problem (I didn't have a household to rule, etc.) - so I said no. Now, I would aslo say no because of my adult child. It is my choice. She will always be my child ... and she still lives in my house (my wife's house - I make the payments, but I think of it as hers). At what age or point is your brother-in-law no longer considered a member of the household? I had not thought about this until now ... I think when they move out - or even get married. We mainly look at the one woman man ... but I see the lists being tough to be qualified fully. |
||||||
3098 | Does God call women to pastor? | Titus 2:4 | Searcher56 | 74736 | ||
Duplicate post means that one posted the same question twice .... usually because of doble clicking. Titus 2:4 does teach women should only pastor / teach other women ... it is one view. Use Quick Search. |
||||||
3099 | Scripture regarding women | Titus 2:4 | Searcher56 | 111807 | ||
Also if read about the kings - see how many times their mother is mentioned. | ||||||
3100 | Why is love philandros not agapao? | Titus 2:4 | Searcher56 | 206974 | ||
Why were the older womwn to encourage (sophronizo) the young women to love (philandros) their husbands (man), to love (philandros) their children? I believe because they were not doing so. But why is the word for love philandros not agapao? |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ] Next > Last [173] >> |