Results 461 - 480 of 3447
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Searcher56 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
461 | Has anyone read BeDuhn's new book? | Phil 2:6 | Searcher56 | 186849 | ||
1) Did you happen to read the post she was responding to? ... yes 2) Did you happen to notice how she responded to it? ... it wasn't clear 3) Did you happen to read the part were she said, Amen and Amen! ... it wasn't clear 4) Did you happen to notice the part were she implied that someone would have to be foolish to believe the teaching of the jw's and watchtower? ... it wasn't clear 5) I didn't see anywhere in terms and conditions were you cant, or even shouldn't reply to an old post. ... the danger is most of the posters have left 6) Are the old-timers the only ones that can have, or open a discussion on a topic? ... no |
||||||
462 | millennium pre and post | Rev 20:5 | Searcher56 | 186847 | ||
God's day to youm God's-elect, What does this portion of the Bible say. How do you handle this verse? Also notice you will reign with Him. Is it all Christians? Searcher | ||||||
463 | 5 Views | 1 Pet 3:19 | Searcher56 | 186760 | ||
Quoting from Bob Deffinbaugh ... The major thrust of Peter’s teaching can be traced in verses 17-18 and verse 22. The problems arise in verses 19-21. The following views sum up the more popular interpretations of this problem passage. (1) Christ preached through Noah to the people of his day. This view was held by Augustine. Christ has always been actively involved in the world, even from ancient times (see Colossians 1:16-17; 1 Corinthians 10:4). He is also vitally involved with the world and His church until He comes again (Matthew 28:20; Acts 9:1-9; 16:7). This view’s main problem is the expression “spirits now130 in prison” which does not seem to be one that most naturally would be used and understood in reference to men. It is true, however, that “spirits” is used in Hebrews 12:23 in reference to those believers who have died. (2) Between the time of our Lord’s death and His resurrection, He descended into the abode of the dead and preached to those who had formerly lived in Noah’s day but were now dead and in prison, spiritually. Matthew 27:52-53 and Ephesians 4:9 are sometimes cited as support. There are several problems with this view. First, why is only this group of unbelieving dead selected and preached to and not all unbelievers? Second, why would the gospel be preached to a group of people who were warned of the coming judgment of God for 120 years and who rejected this warning (see Hebrews 11:7; 2 Peter 2:4-5)? It wasn’t as though these people were not warned. Peter tells us they were disobedient (3:20). Third, at least some of those who hold this view also believe these folks are given a “second chance,” but this seems contrary to other biblical teaching (see, for example, Hebrews 9:27). (3) Between Christ’s death and resurrection, Christ descended into hell and proclaimed His victory to the demonic spirits, who cohabited with women in Noah’s day (see Genesis 6:1-8; 2 Peter 2:4-5, Jude 6; see also 1 Corinthians 15:28; Ephesians 1:18-23; Philippians 2:8-11; Colossians 2:8-15; 1 Peter 4:22). This view seems to square best with Genesis chapter 6, 2 Peter 2 and Jude 6. It appears most consistent with the terms “spirits in prison.” But what does this have to do with Peter’s theme of suffering? (4) Enoch (not Christ) preached to those living in Noah’s day. This is the view of J. Cramer and J. Rendel Harris. It has no textual support, but only a textual emendation (a change of the text, without the existence of any such text) based upon certain presuppositions. It can hardly be taken seriously. (5) “I don’t know what Peter means here.” Luther held this view. We can at least respect his honesty. My questions are ... were thes in prison when Jesus preached to them? ... what does this have to do with suffering ... I see the word in 3:17 and 4:1? |
||||||
464 | jesus spoke to dead | Eccl 9:5 | Searcher56 | 186758 | ||
God's day to you, Aslans_Friend, I suggest you study the context of Isaiah 61:1 and Luke 4:18. Do either support your view of ... "Jesus and presumably refering to those is "Abraham's Bosom" who were released from Sheol as Christ assended on high with captives." ??? Please show me how you came up with your view. Searcher |
||||||
465 | Has anyone read BeDuhn's new book? | Phil 2:6 | Searcher56 | 186757 | ||
God's day to you, Cheri, are you a JW? Why did you post on a post over 2 years old? Searcher | ||||||
466 | Bible inerrancy versus author's mistakes | 2 Tim 3:16 | Searcher56 | 186695 | ||
God's day to you, Aslans_Friend, From an old post of mine ... Ahimelech may of been only a priest, for the word "high" is not there (1Sa 21:1). However, from Josuha 20:6 to 2 Kings 12:10, we do not see the phrase "high priest". On the latter, it seems strange that Jehoiada is only a priest and the high priest is not named. Ahimelech may of been retired as high priest and Abiathar, the high priest was not around when David came. We know that Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech (1Sa 22:20, 23:6, 30:7). However, we see Ahimelech is the son of Abiathar (2Sa 8:17, 1Ch 24:6). Either there is another copiest error, or the son is named after his grandfather. ------------------------------------------- Doc wrote ... The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge states, "The most probable opinion seems to be, that both father and son had two names, the father being also called Abiathar; and this appears almost certain from 2 Samuel 8:17; 1 Chronicles 18:16, where Ahimelech seems evidently termed Abiathar, while Abiathar is called Ahimelech or Abimelech. (Cf 1 Kings 2:26, 27.)" Although I'm sure there has been much discussion and speculation since this statement was penned, it sounds reasonable. It probably represents the general concensus, while avoiding problematic conjecture. ------------------------------------------- The orginial has no mistakes ... there are copist mistakes. Searcher |
||||||
467 | Stretching oneself on a person heals? | Bible general Archive 3 | Searcher56 | 186245 | ||
What I meant by ......... "It is dangerous to cite passages like this and claim it will be true for you ... or anyone else today. While it could be used today, it is not geanerally." ... is that people have claimed (I am not saying you do) that a verse applies to them. Not all verses are for people today. Searcher |
||||||
468 | what does the verse mean? | Ezek 47:5 | Searcher56 | 186200 | ||
God's day to you, Mark, I do understand your view. Searcher | ||||||
469 | The theme is unleashed waters to swin in | Ezek 47:5 | Searcher56 | 186175 | ||
God's day to you, John There is spiritual significance of water ... but not every place, including Ezekiel 47. Searcher |
||||||
470 | The theme is unleashed waters to swin in | Ezek 47:5 | Searcher56 | 186166 | ||
Cheri, So is this true for the Flood of Noah's day? That was even more water. When will this take place? Where is the Holy Spirit at that time? Searcher |
||||||
471 | what does the verse mean? | Ezek 47:5 | Searcher56 | 186165 | ||
God's morning to you, Cheri, The problem is what Mark says, MAY sound good. But, I don't see it as a "description as a picture of the outpouring of God's Spirit" ... it is not in the context. Do not believe everyehing you hear. Check it out (Acts 17:11) ... even from those you trust and have heard/read for years. This is prophecy. Period. Searcher |
||||||
472 | what does the verse mean? | Ezek 47:5 | Searcher56 | 186164 | ||
God's day to you, Mark - I would question if this is a "description as a picture of the outpouring of God's Spirit" ... prove it. I don't see it in the context, so where to you see it? Searcher |
||||||
473 | cremation yes or no | 1 Sam 31:12 | Searcher56 | 186060 | ||
correction - under Search, not Searcher | ||||||
474 | HasFaith is given to all universally? | Bible general Archive 3 | Searcher56 | 185466 | ||
God's day to you, Hobbs. Predestination has been discussed too many times before. Enter Predestination under Search and JUST read. Moreover, it tends to push a demonination ... depending on if one is calvinist or Armenian. All off limits. Searcher |
||||||
475 | Concept of Heaven and Hell in OT | 1 Cor 10:20 | Searcher56 | 184744 | ||
God's day to you, Lon3RB, Alfred H. Ackley wrote He Lives. For more on the story go to http://www.tanbible.com/tol_sng/helives.htm. Searcher |
||||||
476 | Rom 10:9-10 ??? | Rom 10:13 | Searcher56 | 184690 | ||
Excellent points, my brother | ||||||
477 | The fruit and leaves of the tree of life | Gen 2:9 | Searcher56 | 184596 | ||
Peter, I agree with WOS response to you. Moreover, your posts are hrard to read. They should be more white space. Use paragraphs and shorter sentences. If you turned in a paper like this one to me, I'd return it-saying to make it more readable. Searcher PS Please remove mention of your site, it is not appropiate at this forum. |
||||||
478 | Amalekites show up in 1st sam 30:1..???? | 1 Sam 30:1 | Searcher56 | 184542 | ||
Again, I am done with you. You have no proof in what you say. There could have been different tribes of the Amalekites - like the 12 tribes of Israel ... but they still were Amalekites, which Saul failed to eliminate. | ||||||
479 | who was moses mother and dad | Num 26:59 | Searcher56 | 184541 | ||
I am done with you on this subject ... Jochebed was the mother of Moses - it is clear in the Hebrew. | ||||||
480 | who was moses mother and dad | Num 26:59 | Searcher56 | 184502 | ||
Exosus 6:20 says ... Amram married his father's sister Jochebed, and SHE BORE HIM Aaron and Moses; and the length of Amram's life was one hundred and thirty-seven years. Numbers 26:59 says "The name of Amram's wife was Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt" ... this either means Jochebed was very old or that it means that she was a Levite. Searcher |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ] Next > Last [173] >> |