Results 181 - 200 of 787
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Radioman2 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
181 | The Problem with WoF in a nutshell | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 95174 | ||
apostoloB: "Once again I caution you, judging the intent of a man's heart is a treacherous road to travel." Jesus: "for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh." Mt 12:34b |
||||||
182 | The Problem with WoF in a nutshell | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 95135 | ||
Hank: The idea (implied) that we are better off without the Bible and that experience and faith are somehow superior to the Bible is one of the oddest notions I've ever heard. Without the Bible, how do we know who or what to have faith in? "It wasn't until men began translating the bible...that there were difficulties with understanding what God has said...When you operate in the spirit, there is no need for translation." What's that supposed to mean? That ignorance is bliss? It sounds like he's saying that the Word of God is a hindrance to understanding what God has said. This is even more confusing when we consider that the Bible is the record of WHAT GOD HAS SAID. "When you operate in the spirit, there is no need for translation." Contrary to widespread opinion, there is no conflict between the Bible and the Holy Spirit. All we know of the Holy Spirit is contained in the Word of God. I give up! I guess we're living in the bizarro world where up is down and down is up. Sign me Bewildered, Radioman2 |
||||||
183 | 18 Book of Revelation | Revelation | Radioman2 | 95122 | ||
NASB Revelation 1:19 "Therefore write the things which you have seen [past], and the things which are [present], and the things which will take place after these things [FUTURE]." "The best view of Revelation is based upon Rev. 1:19..." -- Tim Moran --Radioman2 |
||||||
184 | The Problem with WoF in a nutshell | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 95107 | ||
Vehoka: No, I was not referring to you in my post, ID# 95027. In the last 365 days, I have submitted 137 posts regarding the Word Faith movement. In all that time, there have been many, many WOF advocates who have posted to the Forum. In the past week there has been much conflict with user gracefull over the WOF issue. I definitely did not have you in mind when I submitted the Note to which you refer. I do not lie. I did not lie to you. I do not see one word of anyone's "opinion" in my Note, ID# 94881. What I see are facts re Fred Price -- documented and verifiable facts. So it is not a matter of me agreeing with someone's opinion. I merely accepted the verifiable and documented facts I quoted. Even if it were opinion, which it was not, quoting someone else's opinion and agreeing with it is not the same as writing my own opinion. As far as issuing disclaimers with my posts, I do so when necessary. I.e., when I have no scriptural or other factual basis for what I post, I label my opinion as opinion. I do not normally post anything that I cannot back up with Scripture or other factual evidence. I am not given to speculating on the Word of God. Once again, I was not referring to you when I said, "...some of the WOF advocates here on this forum thought I was criticizing...". Since I wasn't referring to you, then I made no assumptions about you. I took what you previously posted at face value and hoped that you took what I said at face value. I never even thought you were an "advocate" of the WOF. Nothing you have posted would indicate to me that you were. As far as having a kinder, gentler attitude toward the purveyors of heresy and blasphemy, see Hanks post, ID#95082. I agree with him. I have no reason to bear any ill will toward you. I'm sorry If you interpreted anything I wrote as being hostile toward you. I regret that there has been a misunderstanding regarding my motives and intentions. I welcome you to the forum. Grace and peace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
185 | Women Preachers? Yes or No? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94922 | ||
Jesus said, "Go . . . and make disciples . . ." (Matthew 28:19), not, "Make converts to your own thoughts and opinions." ____________________ "It takes God a long time to get us to stop thinking that unless everyone sees things exactly as we do, they must be wrong." ____________________ "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free . . ." (Galatians 5:1). "A spiritually-minded person will never come to you with the demand-"Believe this and that"; a spiritually-minded person will demand that you align your life with the standards of Jesus. We are [asked]...to believe the One whom the Bible reveals (see John 5:39-40). We are called to present liberty for the conscience of others, not to bring them liberty for their thoughts and opinions. And if we ourselves are free with the liberty of Christ, others will be brought into that same liberty -- the liberty that comes from realizing the absolute control and authority of Jesus Christ. "Always measure your life solely by the standards of Jesus. Submit yourself to His yoke, and His alone; and always be careful never to place a yoke on others that is not of Jesus Christ. It takes God a long time to get us to stop thinking that unless everyone sees things exactly as we do, they must be wrong. That is never God's view. There is only one true liberty -- the liberty of Jesus at work in our conscience enabling us to do what is right. "Don't get impatient with others. Remember how God dealt with you -- with patience and with gentleness. But never water down the truth of God. Let it have its way and never apologize for it. Jesus said, "Go . . . and make disciples . . ." (Matthew 28:19), not, "Make converts to your own thoughts and opinions." (http://www1.gospelcom.net/rbc/utmost/devo/05-06.shtml) --Radioman2 |
||||||
186 | Introducing the English Standard Version | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94920 | ||
Hank and Makarios: I want to be alive in the year 2011 so that I can celebrate the 400th anniversary of the peerless King James Version of the Bible. Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
187 | is it wrong to date or marry outside of | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 94893 | ||
Vehoka: Nowhere does the New Testament prohibit interracial marriage. Even in the OT, the prohibition against Jews marrying Gentiles was for religious -- not racial -- reasons, i.e., so as not to mingle idol worship with the worship of YHWH and so corrupt Israel. (By the way, I have no personal feelings toward Price. Nor did I post my opinion. What I posted is a quote from www.equip.org/free/DC755-1.htm/) Any and all forms of racism are offensive, reprehensible and just plain wrong. Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
188 | Women Preachers? Yes or No? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94883 | ||
Not Subject to the Law of God? You write: 'We "belierers" (sic) are not under the law." My reply: Are We Not Subject To The Law of God? Romans 3:31 (ESV) Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we uphold the law. (Amplified) Do we then by [this] faith make the Law of no effect, overthrow it or make it a dead letter? Certainly not! On the contrary, we confirm and establish and uphold the Law. (GOD'S WORD version) Are we abolishing Moses' Teachings by this faith? That's unthinkable! Rather, we are supporting Moses' Teachings. (From "Not Subject To The Law of God?" Part 8. www.yashanet.com/library/under8.htm All following Scripture quotes are from the GOD'S WORD version of the Bible, unless otherwise noted.) "The teaching that 'we are free from the Torah,' is a product of hundreds of years of anti-Semitic theology and is in opposition to Scripture. The 'New Testament,' when put back into its Hebrew context, says this about the Torah and believers in Yeshua:" Matthew 5:17 "Don't ever think that I came to set aside Moses' Teachings or the Prophets. I didn't come to set them aside but to make them come true. James 2:10 If someone obeys all of God's laws except one, that person is guilty of breaking all of them. Matt 19:17 Jesus said to him, "Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you want to enter into life, obey the commandments." Revelation 12:17 The serpent became angry with the woman. So it went away to fight with her other children, the ones who keep God's commands and hold on to the testimony of Jesus. John 14:15 "If you love me, you will obey my commandments. John 15:10 If you obey my commandments, you will live in my love. I have obeyed my Father's commandments, and in that way I live in his love. Romans 3:31 Are we abolishing Moses' Teachings by this faith? That's unthinkable! Rather, we are supporting Moses' Teachings. 1 John 2:3 We are sure that we know Christ if we obey his commandments. 2:4 The person who says, "I know him," but doesn't obey his commandments is a liar. The truth isn't in that person. 2:5 But whoever obeys what Christ says is the kind of person in whom God's love is perfected. That's how we know we are in Christ. 1 John 5:3 (Revised Standard Version) For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments (Greek: entole [Strong's #1785]: ethically used of the commandments in the Mosaic law). And his commandments (entole) are not burdensome. --Radioman2 |
||||||
189 | is it wrong to date or marry outside of | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 94881 | ||
Chief Exponent of Name It and Claim It Frederick K. C. Price 'Fred Price is the most notable of a growing number of black prosperity preachers. His church in Los Angeles now claims some 16,000 members. He is seen nationally on television and has referred to himself as the "chief exponent of Name It and Claim It."[33] Price has added his own unique twists to Faith theology by asserting that Jesus took on the nature of Satan prior to the crucifixion[34] and by claiming that the Lord's Prayer is not for Christians today.[35] Despite telling his followers that he doesn't allow sickness in his home, Price's wife has been treated for cancer in her pelvic area.[36] Referring to his wealth, Price says the reason he drives a Rolls Royce is that he is following in Jesus' steps.[37]' ____________________ NOTES 33 Frederick K. C. Price, "Name It and Claim It! What Saith the WORD? . . ," Ever Increasing Faith Messenger, Summer 1989, 2. 34 Frederick K. C. Price, "Identification #3" (Inglewood, CA: Ever Increasing Faith Ministries, 1980), audio tape #FP545, side 1. 35 Frederick K. C. Price, personal correspondence, 14 October 1992. 36 Pat Hays, "Betty Price Speaks at 1991 'Wisdom from Above' Luncheon," Ever Increasing Faith Messenger, Winter 1992,12-13. 37 Frederick K. C. Price, Ever Increasing Faith (television program), TBN, 9 December 1990, available from Crenshaw Christian Center, Inglewood, CA (audio tape #CR-A2). (http://www.equip.org/free/DC755-1.htm) |
||||||
190 | Where is a 1,260 year apostasy taught? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94797 | ||
Correction: Isn't it a little silly to accuse me of using Mormon quotes to bash Mormons? I present word-for-word quotes from Mormon Doctrine and various Mormon authors. I do so without note or commentary of my own. And you imply I'm distorting something to bash Mormons. That is as lame an accusation as I've ever heard. --Radioman2 |
||||||
191 | Where is a 1,260 year apostasy taught? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94786 | ||
Isn't it a little silly to accuse me of using Mormon quotes to bash Mormons? I present word-for-word quotes from a website that supports the LDS. I do so without note or commentary of my own. And you imply I'm distorting something to bash Mormons. That is as lame an accusation as I've ever seen. --Radioman2 |
||||||
192 | Where is a 1,260 year apostasy taught? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94752 | ||
What does Mormonism teach? ____________________ 'They teach there was an apostasy ' ____________________ 'The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commonly known as the Mormon church, teaches doctrines in direct opposition to historic Christianity, yet it claims to be the true church of Jesus Christ. Is Mormonism really Christian? We hope to help you answer that question here.' 'The truth is, the following is what Mormons are taught. 'The true gospel was lost from the earth. Mormonism is its restoration, Mormon Doctrine, by Bruce R. McConkie, p. 635. They teach there was an apostasy and the true church ceased to exist on earth. 'We need prophets today, the same as in the Old Testament, Mormon Doctrine, p. 606. 'The book of Mormon is more correct than the Bible, History of the Church, 4:461. 'If it had not been for Joseph Smith and the restoration, there would be no salvation. There is no salvation [the context is the full gospel including exaltation to Godhood] outside the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormon Doctrine, p. 670. 'There are many gods, Mormon Doctrine, p. 163. 'There is a mother god, Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 443. 'God used to be a man on another planet, Mormon Doctrine, p. 321. Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons, Vol 5, pp. 613-614; Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol 2, p. 345, Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333. 'After you become a good Mormon, you have the potential of becoming a god, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pages 345-347, 354. 'God the Father had a Father, Joseph Smith, History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 476; Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, vol. 5, p. 19; Milton Hunter, First Council of the Seventy, Gospel through the Ages, p. 104-105. 'God resides near a star called Kolob, Pearl of Great Price, pages 34-35; Mormon Doctrine, p. 428. 'Some Mormons may disagree with a few of the points listed on this page, but all of what is stated here is from Mormon authors in good standing of the Mormon church.' ____________________ (http://www.carm.org/lds/lds_doctrines.htm) --Radioman2 |
||||||
193 | Where is a 1,260 year apostasy taught? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94749 | ||
whyprophets.com Tim Moran asks: Where does Scripture clearly teach a 1,260 year apostasy? gbennett76 replies to Tim's question by posting the following: "http://www.whyprophets.com/prophets/theyknew.htm" I went to the suggested website. The homepage (http://www.whyprophets.com/index.htm) contained the following sentences, which I quote here. [Note that LDS is the abbreviation for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormon church.)] "Welcome to whyprophets (WP), a web site devoted to exploring Bible prophecy as it relates to the LDS (Mormon) church." "WP [whyprophets.com] endorses the teachings and doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." "WhyProphets.com has received its first award from the LDS web community." "Our goal is to make WP a unique and valuable resource for LDS members and their friends world-wide." "Because we feel that the LDS church has a valuable message for the world about Jesus Christ and the Restoration of His gospel. We feel there exists a great deal of compelling evidence to show that the LDS church fulfils key Bible prophecies, particularly the dated prophecies of Daniel and Revelation." --Radioman2 |
||||||
194 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94730 | ||
they which came out of great tribulation 'Revelation 7:14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. 'tribulation 'The great tribulation is the period of unexampled trouble predicted in the passages cited under that head from Psalms 2:5 to Revelation 7:14 and described in Re 11.-18. Involving in a measure the whole earth Revelation 3:10 it is yet distinctly "the time of Jacob's trouble" Jeremiah 30:7 and its vortex Jerusalem and the Holy Land. It involves the people of God who will have returned to Palestine in unbelief. Its duration is three and a half years, or the last half of the seventieth week of Daniel. (See Scofield "Daniel 9:24") . Revelation 11:2,3 The elements of the tribulation are: '(1) The cruel reign of the "beast out of the sea" Revelation 13:1 who at the beginning of the three and a half years, will break his covenant with the Jews (by virtue of which they will have re-established the temple worship, Daniel 9:27) and show himself in the temple, demanding that he be worshipped as God ; Matthew 24:15; 2 Thessalonians 2:4. '(2) The active interposition of Satan "having great wrath" Revelation 12:12 who gives his power to the Beast Revelation 13:4,5. '(3) The unprecedented activity of demons Revelation 9:2,11 and '(4) the terrible "bowl" judgments of Re 16. 'The great tribulation will be, however, a period of salvation. An election out of Israel is seen as sealed for God Revelation 7:4-8 and, with an innumerable multitude of Gentiles Revelation 7:9 are said to have come "out of the great tribulation" Revelation 7:14. They are not of the priesthood, the church, to which they seem to stand somewhat in the relation of the Levites to the priests under the Mosaic Covenant. The great tribulation is immediately followed by the return of Christ in glory, and the events associated therewith Matthew 24:29,30.' ____________________ Note at Revelation 7:14 in the Scofield Reference Bible. Scofield, C.I. "Scofield Reference Notes on Revelation 7". "Scofield Reference Notes (1917 Edition)". (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/ScofieldReferenceNotes) --Radioman2 |
||||||
195 | faith and believe are they the same? | Heb 11:1 | Radioman2 | 94725 | ||
You write: "with faith you may not KNOW how it will happen, but you FEEL(believe) it is possible" I respectfully disagree. 'Do not depend upon feelings. The promise of God's Word, not our feelings, is our authority. The Christian lives by faith (trust) in the trustworthiness of God Himself and His Word. This train diagram [see the website listed below] illustrates the relationship between fact (God and His Word), faith (our trust in God and His Word), and feeling (the result of our faith and obedience) (John 14:21). [In the train diagram, Fact is the engine that pulls the train. Faith is the car directly behind Fact (the engine). At the very end of the train is the caboose, which is Feeling.] 'The train will run with or without the caboose [Feeling]. However, it would be futile to attempt to pull the train by the caboose. In the same way, we, as Christians, do not depend upon feelings or emotions, but we place our faith (trust) in the trustworthiness of God and the promises of His Word' (Have You Made the Wonderful Discovery of the Spirit-Filled Life? (http://archive.christianwomentoday.com/spiritfilledlife.html)). Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
196 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94688 | ||
DarcyA: On most points you and I and others probably agree on the teaching of the rapture -- that it is real, it is yet future, and is defined as that event when "...the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord" (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 (KJV)) I think we would both agree with this definition of what the rapture is. The only point of disagreement seems to be the timing of the rapture. And as someone has said, as far as when the rapture will occur, "It's time to get off the program committee and get on the welcoming committee." :-) Grace and peace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
197 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94685 | ||
DarcyA: Thank you for clearing that up. I appreciate it. Sincerely, Radioman2 |
||||||
198 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94681 | ||
Please tell me the post ID# and the exact words I used when I allegedly said, "there is no support of someones web sight." I don't remember saying "there is no support of someones web sight." What web site are you referring to? --Radioman2 |
||||||
199 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94675 | ||
DarcyA writes: "Still waiting for you to reply to my posts...Also I can settle the 2 Thess with a pretrib view as whoever you are getting your information from falsely states the pretrib view can't. But I would like my other refernces talked about before I go any farther on the pretrib view. Which hasn't been done yet." ____________________ No, it hasn't been done yet. And it isn't going to be done. Not by me -- not now and not later. I'm not here to engage in endless debate or to try to win arguments. For further information on the pretrib question, go to (www.solagroup.org/). --Radioman2 |
||||||
200 | Pre-Tribulation Rapture | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 94671 | ||
DOES PRETRIB HAVE SOLID SCRIPTURAL BASIS? 'Second, pretribulationism has no clear biblical basis of support, only problem passages such as 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8 (which is ignored) and Matthew 24:15-31 (which is ascribed to unsaved Israel). By comparison, the prewrath position can be clearly argued from the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and the Book of Revelation, with absolute consistency and no contradictions, letting the student of God's Word compare Scripture with Scripture without fear of contradiction, finding instead perfect harmony in all that is recorded in the New Testament.' To read more go to: (http://www.solagroup.org/articles/endtimes/et_0006.html) |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Next > Last [40] >> |