Results 281 - 300 of 581
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: New Creature Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
281 | names of 3 wise men | Matt 2:1 | New Creature | 164532 | ||
Doc; Are you aware of the fact that a nativity display will not be set up in Washington this year? The word is, they couldn't find three wise men to complete the display. Just thought I'd humor you Blessings Doc NC |
||||||
282 | Is OT still applicable for NT believers | Matt 5:18 | New Creature | 45825 | ||
Thanks Joe So would it be absolutely accurate in your opinion, to at the same time say, that 35.768 percent of the OT does not apply to NT Christians |
||||||
283 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103487 | ||
Dear Brother Tim. Since I highly respect your opinion on spiritual matters, I feel it necessary to ask a question concerning this topic. In your advice to BigJim, you stated: "Scripture allows divorce for adultry. If this were the case, I would say that you could marry her." I agree with you that Scripture does allow for divorce where adultery has been committed, I have yet to find any scripture that would allow the person who is divorced, whether through any fault on their part or not, to be eligible for remarriage, Look at Mt. 19:9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. Unless I am mistaken this verse addresses both the gulity party and the non-guilty party. And the sense is that if either one of these remarry then they have committed adultery. Am I reading this correctly? Blessings my friend New Creature |
||||||
284 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103492 | ||
Dear Brother Tim; Thank you for your input. I cannot comprehend exactly how Spiros Zodhiates's draws his final conclusions on this topic, but I have read some of his material, and respect his views as well. A couple of years ago I led a small group in a challenging Bible Study of the Epistle of 1 John. Many times I often resorted to Spiros Zodhiates Exegetical Commentary on this Letter for input. However while using this commentary as a tool, I found that while I found myself mostly in agreement with Mr. Zodhiates, there were a couple of instances where I had to disagree with his intrepretation of scripture. Thanks again May God continue to bless you in your service to Him New Creature |
||||||
285 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103576 | ||
justme Sorry you feel the way you do. I gave an answer which I supported with scripture. Can you provide any other scripture that would disagree with the scripture that I provided. Matt. 19:9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. Peace New Creature |
||||||
286 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103577 | ||
Radioman I agree with you that there are scriptural grounds for divorce. What I fail to find in Scripture is scriptural support that the one who has been divorced should be free to remarry. Can you provide me with scripture that would advise divorced individuals to remarry? Peace New Creature |
||||||
287 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103578 | ||
justme You stated that 1 Cor. 7:15-40 provides the context for remarriage. In that text the only situation for remarriage that I can find is upon the death of ones spouse. As we state in our vows on our wedding day "unto death do we part" Can you specifically show me any verse that gives clear support for the go-ahead for a divorced individual to remarry while the spouse is yet living? Peace New Creature |
||||||
288 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103579 | ||
Radioman This answer which you provided is the most useful answer I have yet to come across. It even forces me to rethink my position on this topic. Thank you for this well thought out answer. Blessings New Creature |
||||||
289 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103582 | ||
justme Thank you for admonishing me on this issue. My view has been altered by a reply from Radioman. See my second reply to BigJim Sorry if I caused you any undue grief Blessings New Creature |
||||||
290 | based on Mt. 5:32 may I marry a divorced | Matt 5:32 | New Creature | 103606 | ||
justme Thank you I pray that the Lord will comfort you in the circumstance you are undergoing Blessings New Creature |
||||||
291 | Can A Christian disown Christ? | Matt 10:33 | New Creature | 116461 | ||
Sir Pent; I just would like to thank both you and Nolan, for this beautiful exchange in dialoge. I would also like to thank you for awakening us to the dangers of becoming lukewarm, backslidding, apostasy or what ever it was that you experienced. It May be very possible that you were at the brink of full apostasy, from which there is no return. Thank you again for sharing with this forum. God bless and keep you New Creature |
||||||
292 | Who committs the unpardonable sin? | Matt 12:32 | New Creature | 128094 | ||
hello once again tgc; you said: "Here we go again this should be fun and informative" I hope so. I sure come up with some beauties don't I? I personally am not dogmatic in my answer on this. I hope to have those who understand Scripture better than I do, to help me come to a correct understanding on this. God Bless New Creature |
||||||
293 | Who committs the unpardonable sin? | Matt 12:32 | New Creature | 128118 | ||
Hank; Thanks for your thoughts on this, however, I didn't list Heb. 6:4-6 as a reference. |
||||||
294 | Who committs the unpardonable sin? | Matt 12:32 | New Creature | 128199 | ||
Stultis the Fool Thank you for your response. I don't disagree with what you stated. |
||||||
295 | Your thoughts? | Matt 12:32 | New Creature | 128374 | ||
Hello tgc; In a comment to fool, you said: "Can a christan backslide yes and will God deal with that yes but He will deal with that person as a parent deals with a child and yes that can sometimes be quite severe up to and including physical death. But God will not cast that child away from Him" In the final sentence of that paragraph, it is said; "God will not cast that child away from Him." I agree with that, however let me ask; Since we agree that God won't cast His child away. Is it possible that the child can cast God away? Let me reword that in the following manner. Is it possible for the child to disown God? Blessings to you New Creature |
||||||
296 | Do tares represent hypocrites? | Matt 13:38 | New Creature | 105283 | ||
Thank you Searcher | ||||||
297 | Do tares represent hypocrites? | Matt 13:38 | New Creature | 105285 | ||
Thanks Ray you stated; "Many weeds look like the crop they grow in" Don't people who attend church all look pretty much alike outwardly as well? This is why I think it is very likely that the tares of Matthew 13 could actually be representative of counterfeit Christian's or hypocrites - those who are pretending to be something they in actuality they really aren't New Creature |
||||||
298 | Is God Lord over all except human will | Matt 22:14 | New Creature | 85825 | ||
John I find Scriptural support for my statement - "not willing for any to perish" 2 Pet. 3:9 You failed to support the following statement you made with Scripture - "Even if "any" refers to any in a universal sense and not to "any" in the sense of the elect, God must be willing in another sense FOR people to perish because it happens. Therefore, it may not please Him that they perish but He does not prevent it, which He could if He pleased." All the other statements I made in my previous reply were supported with Scripture. You also appeared to disagree with such Scriptural statements that Jesus draws all men to Himself. Unless you alter that statement to say Jesus draws some men to Himself, your interpretation appears faulty to me. If all men do not receive the light, then John 1:9 needs to be removed from the Bible also. So how do you work around such verses without modifying the plain meaning? New Creature |
||||||
299 | Is God Lord over all except human will | Matt 22:14 | New Creature | 85872 | ||
John I thank you for being willing to reply to my questions. We may not agree with particular meaning of Scripture. Nevertheless, I hope you find this question and answering as a spiritual exercise in properly dividing the word of truth. I will wait for your response concerning John 1:9 New Creature |
||||||
300 | Is God Lord over all except human will | Matt 22:14 | New Creature | 86104 | ||
John From the following statement in your reply; "It is a mistake to believe that fallen mankind just needs to be presented with the facts concerning the gospel, and then are free to make a choice based upon the desire of their hearts. For one thing, their hearts are wicked and their desires evil. That desire being to embrace Christ or to reject Him. "...no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father." John 6:65 and Matt 15:19 "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders." Can I conclude that you personally believe the gift of salvation can be rejected as well as received New Creature |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ] Next > Last [30] >> |