Results 781 - 800 of 1935
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: BradK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
781 | Still not convinced preterism is false | Matt 16:28 | BradK | 183645 | ||
Hello jonp, Thanks for your comments. I'm not sure if they were directed to me, as I have a bit of trouble connecting what you said to the matter of Preterism. Did I miss something? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
782 | why should we pray and speak in tongues | Bible general Archive 3 | BradK | 183546 | ||
Hello wonbyone, 1 Cor 12:30 "All do not have gifts of healings, do they? All do not speak with tongues, do they? All do not interpret, do they?" 1 Cor 12:31 "But earnestly desire the greater gifts. And I show you a still more excellent way."(NASB) 1 Cor 14:1 "Pursue love, yet desire earnestly spiritual..." (NASB) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
783 | gift of tongues- t/lation of 1Cor14:2 | 1 Cor 14:2 | BradK | 183261 | ||
Hello PDAL, It would be hard to argue with your reflections of experience since they are just that. However, I can only hope you show as much LOVE- if not more- as you speak in tongues. Love is the greater. If I might ask, how does "Speaking in tongues bypasses our carnal thinking"? Personally, I hear and move by the spirit(sic) through reading and meditating on God's word and prayer! Dr. James Raiford, in his current exposition on 1 Corinthians, "The Corinthian Confusion" offers this point: "Historically, within the ranks of evangelical Bible teaching churches, there has and continues to be an erosion of the graces of the Spirit and the elevation of the Gifts of the Spirit. The implications communicated are alarming within Christian church families. Galatians is clear at this point: love is the product of the Holy Spirit and just because you are a Christian does not mean you are walking in the Spirit. The passage in Acts states it clearly: God says the early church communicated their love for one another. The Corinthian congregation was instructed in depth on the subject of love." Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
784 | do we choose how long we live | Ps 90:10 | BradK | 182460 | ||
Dear gesujoy..., You're quite right to be confused. According to your sister then, God is not really sovereign. An impossiblity! Pray tell what verse in the Bible teaches this? Did Jesus not do God's will as He died well before Her reached 70! BradK |
||||||
785 | Men had multiple wives in the old test. | Matt 19:5 | BradK | 182197 | ||
Hello rodent_tamer, Tyndale's Bible Dictionary says this about polygamy: "The idea of marriage was ordained by God in his instruction to Adam that a man should leave his father and mother, and that he and his wife should be as one flesh (Gn 2:24). Several forms of marriage are referred to in the OT, the earliest of which seems to be based on a matrilineal principle. Although there appears to be some evidence for this in the middle Bronze Age and in the early monarchy, it is difficult to be certain about the matter, despite the importance in Egypt, and perhaps elsewhere, of the role of the mother in determining descent. Despite numerous examples of polygamy cited in the OT, there is no doubt that the vast majority of the Israelites were monogamous. There are no examples given of large polygamous marriages in the families of commoners. The original instruction to Adam was that a “man … cleaves to his wife” (Gen. 2:24). Hebrew laws generally imply that a marriage with one wife is the most acceptable form of marriage (Ex. 20:17; 21:5; Lev. 18:8, 16–20; 20:10; Num. 5:12; Deut. 5:21). Although this seems to have become the norm by the time of the monarchy, a king such as Solomon did not follow Hebrew traditions in this matter. In the postexilic period marriages were predominantly monogamous, although they were being terminated increasingly by divorce. In the NT period monogamy seems to have been the rule, although persons such as Herod the Great were polygamous. Christ taught that marriage should last the lifetime of the partners, and if a man divorced his wife and married another woman during his previous spouse’s lifetime, he committed adultery (Matt 5:31–32)." Certainly, in my mind Solomon stands out as one who fell- in part- due to his "polygamous" ways. Warned by God in 1 Kings 9:6 to, "...keep My commandments and My statutes which I have set before you, and go and serve other gods and worship them," (with the consequences given in vs. 7ff). We see the result in 1 Kings 11:3-4, "He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines, and his wives turned his heart away. For when Solomon was old, his wives turned his heart away after other gods; and his heart was not wholly devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been." (NASB) Subsequently, I find a lack of detailed examples in the Bible showing any positive benefits (results) of polygamy! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
786 | The Name /One Lord | Matt 28:19 | BradK | 181920 | ||
Dear shing, I'm going to second brother Doc's motion on this matter:-) I know brother Steve and his heart and I believe him to be on track with his point. Instead of taking what he's saying only as criticism, be mature enough to actually hear his words. (Eph. 4:16) Though this is a public Forum there are posted guidelines for all to read and follow. Please avail yourself of them as it may help keep you from becoming unduly frustrated. Might I offer Prov. 19:20 as a guide: "Listen to counsel and accept discipline, That you may be wise the rest of your days" (NASB) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
787 | The Book of 1 John | John 3:16 | BradK | 181890 | ||
Hello shing, As a note to your response, we need to be careful in taking the English meaning/definition of a word that was originally in Hebrew (OT), or Greek (NT), Since the Bible was originally penned in these languages, it is incumbent upon a true student of scripture to have at least a cursory understanding of them. Words mean things and one cannot simply derive the absolute sense of a word within a passage without knowing the original intent and henceforth meaning. It is called Word Study:-) The context in which the word is found, also is paramount in understanding it's true meaning! Allow me to address these to passages briefly: 1. In Gen. 6:9, the Heb. word for "blameless" is tamiym. It carries the basic meaning of, "complete", "whole", "entire", and "sound". The Commentary Critical gives this explanation: "6:9. Noah - just- and perfect—not absolutely; for since the fall of Adam no man has been free from sin except Jesus Christ. But as living by faith he was just (Gal. 3:2; Heb. 11:7) and perfect—that is, sincere in his desire to do God’s will." 2. The same principle follows in examining Matt. 5:48. The Greek word for "perfect" is telios. It carries the primary meaning of "brought to its end", then "finished, "wanting nothing", "necessary to completeness", and then thirdly, "perfect". Noted Greek scholar Dr. A.T Robertson had this to say on Matt. 5:48: "Perfect [teleioi]. The word comes from [telos], end, goal, limit. Here it is the goal set before us, the absolute standard of our Heavenly Father. The word is used also for relative perfection as of adults compared with children." The Bible Knowledge Commentary makes this observation: "Jesus concluded this section by saying, Be perfect therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. His message demonstrated God’s righteous standard, for God Himself truly is the “standard” of righteousness. If these individuals are to be righteous, they must be as God is, “perfect,” that is, mature (teleioi) or holy. Murder, lust, hate, deception, and retaliation obviously do not characterize God. He did not lower His standard to accommodate humans; instead He set forth His absolute holiness as the standard. Though this standard can never be perfectly met by man himself, a person who by faith trusts in God enjoys His righteousness being reproduced in his life." Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
788 | The Book of 1 John | John 3:16 | BradK | 181802 | ||
Dear shing, I'm inclined to agree with brother Steve on this matter. Nowhere does scripture say either Noah or Job were perfect- in the sense that they were without sin. Gen. 6:9 reads (NASB) "righteous" and "blameless" in regards to his character. Only "in Christ" are we righteous. 2 Cor 5:21 tells us, "He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." (NASB) I have no righteousness or righteous standing apart from Him! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
789 | Is Jesus Angry everyday? | Ps 7:11 | BradK | 181691 | ||
Hello giant..., I think you misunderstood the context of the response I gave:-) I replied to the posted question: "Is Jesus angry every day". Just so I'm clear: My reply was giving a brief example of God's Holiness. Because He is Holy He cannot look upon sin. In other words, sin and a Holy God are mutually exclusive. (hence, Ps. 7:11) However, God dealt with the sin issue on the cross through Christ (Rom. 6:10). Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
790 | What sort of New Year’s Resolution... | Bible general Archive 3 | BradK | 181648 | ||
Dear Forum: In answer to, "What sort of New Year’s Resolution should a Christian make?", I submit the wisdom of Jonathan Edwards: Jonathan Edwards’ Resolutions- Resolved, to live with all my might while I do live. Resolved, never to lose one moment of time, to improve it in the most profitable way I can. Resolved, never to do anything which I should despise or think meanly of in another. Resolved, never to do anything out of revenge. Resolved, never to do anything which I should be afraid to do if it were the last hour of my life." [Paul Lee Tan, Encyclopedia of 7700 Illustrations] Best Wishes for a Blessed and Happy New Year, BradK |
||||||
791 | Were Ananias and Sapphira believers? | Acts 5:5 | BradK | 181597 | ||
Hello rj..., Again, nowhere in the text in Acts 5 (and preceding) does it specifically state they were believers! I find it most interesting that Peter tells Ananias in vs. 3, "why has Satan filled your heart". This is very similar to John 13:2 where it is recorded that "...the devil having already put it into the heart of Judas, to betray Him". In my mind, this does not seem descriptive of a true believer. Might you also elaborate on exactly how would you conclude "that God took them to Heaven"? This is not mentioned in the text but may be (incorrectly) inferred:-) Interestingly, Matthew Henry gives his view on this- with which I generally concur: "The sin of Ananias and Sapphira his wife. It is good to see husband and wife joining together in that which is good, but to be confederate in evil is to be like Adam and Eve, when they agreed to eat the forbidden fruit, and were one in their disobedience. Now their sin was, 1. That they were ambitious of being thought eminent disciples, and of the first rank, when really they were not true disciples; they would pass for some of the most fruitful trees in Christ’s vineyard, when really the root of the matter was not found in them. They sold a possession, and brought the money (as Barnabas did) to the apostles’ feet, that they might not seem to be behind the very chief of believers, but might be applauded and cried up, and stand so much the fairer for preferment in the church, which perhaps they thought would shortly shine in secular pomp and grandeur. Note, It is possible that hypocrites may deny themselves in one thing, but then it is to serve themselves in another; they may forego their secular advantage in one instance, with a prospect of finding their account in something else. Ananias and Sapphira would take upon them a profession of Christianity, and make a fair show in the flesh with it, and so would mock God, and deceive others, when they knew they could not go through with the Christian profession. It was commendable, and so far it was right, in that rich young man, that he would not pretend to follow Christ, when, if it should come to a pinch, he knew he could not come up to his terms, but he went away sorrowful. Ananias and Sapphira pretended they could come up to the terms, that they might have the credit of being disciples, when really they could not, and so were a discredit to discipleship. Note, It is often of fatal consequence for people to go a greater length in profession than their inward principle will admit of." As to the fact they ,"...have not lied to men but to God" (Holy Spirit) the Commentary Critical makes this observation: "not lied to men but God—to men so entirely the instruments of the directing Spirit that the lie was rather told to Him: language clearly implying both the distinct personality and the proper divinity of the Holy Ghost." [Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, A. R. Fausset et al., A Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments] Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
792 | ... | NT general Archive 1 | BradK | 180807 | ||
Dear Cuddle, Let me join my colleagues in giving you some helpful advice:-) You would be well served to read the "About Forum" and "Terms of Use" to better understand the guidelines set forth by Lockman. You also might want to observe from the sidelines a bit to get the flavor of this Forum. Once again, in a public Forum such as this, your ideas and responses are open to scrutiny. Not everyone will be in agreement with you (or me). It is a fact of life:-) Lastly, your hostile attitude will not benefit you in learning a thing. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
793 | What happens immediatly after you die? | 2 Corinthians | BradK | 180509 | ||
Hello ebrain, Timothy Dwight- the grandson of Jonathan Edwards- had this to say (in part)regarding the intermediate state: "There has been no small debate among divines, and those of great reputation, concerning the places where the dead will reside between their departure from this world, and the final judgment. This subject demands too extensive a consideration to be attempted at the present time. It must be acknowledged, that the language of the Scriptures furnishes a foundation for some difference of opinion concerning it. Several expressions, found in both Testaments, seem to indicate an intermediate place, as well as an intermediate state of existence, between this world, and the final scenes of retribution. After a considerable examination of this subject, and an examination of several able commentators, who have handled it to some extent, I am obliged to confess myself not altogether satisfied; and to say, that hitherto I have found difficulties on both sides. I know of no method in which they can be removed, except a direct recurrence to every scriptural passage which relates to the subject, a thorough consideration of each, and an attentive comparison of them all. It is undoubtedly true, that the Hebrew , shed, and the Greek hades, commonly rendered hell, or the grave, in our Translation, do not properly signify either; but always the world of departed spirits. As these words have so extensive a signification, and must be interpreted by every passage of Scripture referring to that world, there must be room for considerable difference of opinion. But, whatever may be true concerning an intermediate place of existence, there can, I apprehend, be no reasonable doubt concerning an intermediate state. St. Peter says of the angels that sinned, that God ‘cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment.’ St. Jude, also, declares, them to be ‘reserved,’ is like manner, ‘unto the judgment of the great day.’ From these declarations it is manifest, that fallen angels have not yet received their final judgment, nor of course their final reward. This indeed seems evident from the phraseology used by St. Peter, as well as by the declarations of both hint and St. Jude, The word which is rendered from St. Peter, ‘cast them down to hell,’ is in the Greek, tartarwsav; literally rendered, ‘cast them down to Tartarus.’ While this phraseology plainly declares a state of punishment; it indicates directly a different state from that which is taught by the word geenna; the appropriate name of hell in the Scriptures. After ‘the rich man died and was buried,’ it is said by our Saviour, ‘he lift up his eyes in hell, being in torments;’ in the Greek, en tw aJdh, ‘in hades he lift up his eyes, being in torments.’ This word also denotes with sufficient clearness a different state of suffering from that which is intended by the word geenna. In the same parable Lazarus is declared to be ‘carried by angels to Abraham’s bosom.’ The state in which Lazarus was placed is denoted elsewhere by the word Paradise. ‘To day,’ said our Saviour to the thief on the cross, ‘thou shalt be with me in Paradise.’ But we know from ˆ our Saviour’s own declaration, that when he gave up the ghost on the cross, his spirit went, not to hell, but to hades, or sheol. For in the sixteenth Psalm, he himself says, ‘Thou wilt not leave my soul in sheol;’ rendered both by the Septuagint, and by St. Peter (quoting this passage, Acts 2:27, and referring to it in verse 31) by hades, the Greek word, by which sheol is always translated both in the Old and New Testament. Thus it is, ‘Thou wilt not leave my soul in hades,’ and in verse 31, ‘his soul was not left in hades.’ The thief therefore went to the state which is denoted by this word; and not to that which is denoted by heaven, unless this word is supposed to include heaven. In Hebrews 11:39, 40, St. Paul says of the ancient saints, ‘And these" [CONSEQUENCES OF DEATH- The Immediate Consequences of Death- Timothy Dwight] Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
794 | Stephen performed miracles too? | Acts 6:8 | BradK | 180491 | ||
Dear 2 Tim, My response was not intended as a rebuke! I am simply challenging your assertion:-) In all honesty, you are side-stepping the question. In a public Forum such as this, all of our views are open to scrutiny by our peers. It is not my desire to debate, and I'm not inclined reply to a question that skirts the issue. At any rate, you are welcome to your view, but you are still very much lacking in providing any Biblical support! Your lack of response is coming across like a pedantic "because". I leave this thread on this note. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
795 | is suicide a sin? | NT general Archive 1 | BradK | 180488 | ||
??? BradK |
||||||
796 | is suicide a sin? | NT general Archive 1 | BradK | 180478 | ||
Hello 2 Tim, Your contributions and questions are appreciated, by all of us on the SBF. However, the reason this was asked was this Forum- supported and run by The Lockman Foundation- has certain rules and terms of use. They can be found in: "About Forum" and "Terms of Use". It behooves all registrants to familiarize themselves with these instructions:-) Specifically: "Certain areas of The Lockman Foundation Web Site require registration before authorized access is granted(hereinafter “Restricted Area”). You may not access these areas unless you have registered with us to do so. By registering in these areas, you are representing to The Lockman Foundation that you are at least 18 years old (or the minimum legal age in the jurisdiction in which you are viewing The Restricted Area)." Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
797 | Stephen performed miracles too? | Acts 6:8 | BradK | 180477 | ||
Hello 2 Tim, Generally on this Forum, it is expected that the one making an assertion must prove their point via scripture. What you did quote a bunch of verses- without context! Without context all we have is a pretext! Can you be a little more specific? For instance: 1. Which verses would support (in context) that believers TODAY have the same ability as the Apostles did to perform miracles? 2. Is what was described in the Gospels and Acts a prescription for ALL believers? If so, how? Simply quoting verses is what is commonly referred to as "proof-texting". Anyone can do this to support a view. Serous exegesis requires more diligence and study:-) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
798 | Stephen performed miracles too? | Acts 6:8 | BradK | 180463 | ||
Hello 2 Tim, You stated: "Since believers have the Holy Spirit as well, wouldn't it make sense modern-day believers can do miracles as well?" While I can appreciate your use of logic and deduction, did you have a scriptural basis to support it? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
799 | Whom baptizes with the Holy Ghost | Bible general Archive 3 | BradK | 180048 | ||
Dear Asuba, Hmmm... How exactly did you arrive at this conclusion?? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
800 | are the ten commandments in effect? | 1 John | BradK | 179906 | ||
Hello dill1, I'm not exacly sure why you are "sick of being told that they were nailed to the cross". Your argument then appears to be with scripture. For, Col. 2:13-14, states: "When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross." The claims of the law were met when we were put to death in the Person of a Substitite (Rom. 7:4-6)! God's law still stands in all its righteousness, but our relationship to it has changed! We are no longer under its dominion and condemnation. Do you see another function of the 10 Commandments for the believer? Are you suggesting that a believer must still "keep the law"? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ] Next > Last [97] >> |