Results 1901 - 1920 of 1935
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: BradK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1901 | IS TONGUES FOR TODAY? | 1 Cor 14:5 | BradK | 55298 | ||
Dear HamsteRulz, Your statement that "The Father is not God, the Son is not God, and the Holy Spirit is not God is CLEARLY contradicted by scripture and is utterly blasphemous! It goes far beyond " a different understanding of the Word" my friend. Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1902 | Do you yet say that Jesus was just a man | John 9:24 | BradK | 55095 | ||
Dear Stokeyhk, To claim that you "believe" something suggests nothing more that supposition, or speculation. The Bible supports no such notion that Christ was born three times. Heresy might be a better term. As far as Col.1:15, the term "firstborn" refers to position NOT chronology.(cf Col.1:17-18, Gr. Prototokos) A more precise translation of Romans 1:4 would read that He (Christ) "was APPOINTED the SON OF GOD IN POWER, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead". The Lord Jesus Christ has always been the Eternal Son of God! To claim otherwise is to be clearly outside the bounds of Orthodox Christianity. Yours In Christ, BradK |
||||||
1903 | confused | Rom 4:5 | BradK | 54865 | ||
Hi Steve, I'll enter into the discussion here as I do hold to a Dispensational view of scripture. I'm very familiar with a lot of the leading proponents, such as Chafer, Scofield and Bullinger, having studied and read some of their works.( I use Bullingers' Companion Bible frequently as a resource) Some, such as Bullinger are viewed as having a "hyper"-dispensational theology. I do know of Darby, but have not read his works( I do have his Darby Bible on my Logos software). I've found through my growing in the Lord that "labels" are sometimes hard to defend. It depends where someone is coming from, or what their preconceptions are of the term. As I view it, Dispensationalism is a framework through which to view scripture. It's a method of interpretation. It is not always agreed upon, and certainly has detractors within Evangelical Christianity regarding some of its' tenets, specifically water baptism, and the start of the Church, and the nation of Israel vs. the Body of Christ. Interestingly, the church I attend does not adhere to a strict Dispensational theology, nor do my Pastor and I agree on every issue. However, we have agreed to disagree and are good friends and enjoy each others fellowship. I believe it to provide a very sound framework through which to understand the whole of scripture and to make sense of seeming "contradictions". That is why I am a proponent of this system. Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1904 | question to smoke pot or not | Gen 1:12 | BradK | 54734 | ||
Dear Jeshuafreak, I would trust that my somewhat sarcastic remarks did in no way offend you, brother. I am not a Doctor obviously, so there may well be some legitimate medical useage for Marijuana. I would venture to say it's a small minority. My points are strictly intended for those who would use their "liberty in Christ for an opportunity for the flesh". The distinction between drug abuse and "legitimate" medical applications is pretty fine. Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1905 | question to smoke pot or not | Gen 1:12 | BradK | 54731 | ||
Dear Hank and 2 Samuel 22, Your observations are noted and applauded. I have to add a couple final notes to this topic. 1. christiansforcannabis.com is a sad but sorry attempt to justify their behavior from a scriptural standpoint. But, where do we stop? How about: Christians for Heroin, Christians for Acid, or Christians for Mescaline, etc. Where does it end?; 2. Can anyone seriously picture our Lord, Jesus Christ, in His Holiness engaging in illicit drug use? If He wouldn't, why should we? Lets'get real! Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1906 | question to smoke pot or not | Gen 1:12 | BradK | 54722 | ||
Dear Jeshuafreak, I trust that I understand the question being asked. Certainly, what someone purposes to do in the privacy of their own home is between them and the Lord. However, in my estimation it's a smoke-screen to justify un-godly conduct (pun intended). Galatians 6 speaks to our focus and the results of our reaping. I speak from extensive personal knowledge and experience. Prior to my coming to the Lord in 1985, I had been a heavy user of marijuana and other substances. Let me offer 3 brief points in comment: 1. This appears to be a Libertarian issue. I'm very familiar with their position on a number of issues and endorse most of their Political/Economical views. However, I would take strong exception to their stance on most social issues, such as this because I feel they take personal freedom beyond Biblical injunctions; 2. Marijuana and other such controlled substances are ILLEGAL! Do we advocate that a "Christian" knowingly and willingly break the law? I think not. Christ spoke to this matter in general in Matt. 22:21. How do we reconcile breaking the law with Pauls' admonition in Titus 2;6-7, "to be sober minded?" (See also Tit. 3:3,..."serving various lusts and pleasures..."); 3. I had a brother in the Lord ask me this past year,'what legalizing marijuana had to do with being a Christian?' I challenged him to provide me with any scriptural support or basis to his arguement. He never answered back. My question would be this: Where do we find Biblical admonition to smoke pot? We can't appeal to this based upon the silence of scripture. However, here's what we do know. Paul in 1 Cor.6 and 10 says, "All things are lawful for me, but not all things are not helpful (profitable)... I don't know how being "stoned" would be profitable or for that matter edifying! Further, in Gal.5:13 we have the practice of liberty with parameters,..."do not use liberty as an opportunity for THE FLESH, but through love serve one another." If marijuana is not a desire of the flesh I don't know what is. Lastly, how would Pauls' imperative in 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 be viewed? How would my getting high "glorify God in my body?" I hope this perspective is of help. Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1907 | What commandments to keep? | 1 John 2:4 | BradK | 54684 | ||
Hi Hank, I believe I was responding to Bubbatate. Are they part of history now? God Bless. BradK |
||||||
1908 | Eternal Security is it possible? | 2 Tim 1:12 | BradK | 54625 | ||
Dear Robert, Excellent post, brother. I will once more concur with one who has exhibited soundness in doctrine! God Bless. Yours In Christ, BradK |
||||||
1909 | What commandments to keep? | 1 John 2:4 | BradK | 54622 | ||
Dear Bubbatate, You said in giving your definition of inerrancy "He didn't say Pauls' word or anybody elses'. If anything contradicts a 'thus saith the LORD' I'm not including it in my theology". Am I correct to understand that you would not hold the Pauline Epistles on the same level of authority as the OT or Gospels? ( 2 Tim. 3:16) Jesus said to her," I am the resurrection and the life: he who believes in Me will live even if he dies, and everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die. Do you believe this?" ( Jn.11:25,26) Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1910 | What commandments to keep? | 1 John 2:4 | BradK | 54594 | ||
Dear Bubbatate, Thank you very much for providing your testimony. It helps me to better understand you. You have a very diverse background. God Bless. Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1911 | Jesus and God the Father not the same? | Col 3:17 | BradK | 54567 | ||
Dear HamsteRulz, As you have no User Profile, I assume you'd send your explanation to the Forum? I'd like to see it. Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1912 | What commandments to keep? | 1 John 2:4 | BradK | 54541 | ||
Dear Bubbatate, Frankly, I must admit to being confused regarding the content of some of your posts. It might be fair to ask that you "show us your hand" so-to-speak! I've stated my purpose in previous posts, and a summary of my beliefs are under my user info. Would you be so kind as to either provide myself or the Forum with a short bio, or perhaps let us know where you stand in regard to the Essentials of the Christian Faith. I would like to know if you do hold to the inerrency of scripture, and if you've accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. As this is the world-view of this Forum, I think it is a fair request. Respectfully Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1913 | What commandments to keep? | 1 John 2:4 | BradK | 54538 | ||
Dear Joe, Great post! I think you're right on, brother. God Bless. Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1914 | Jesus and God the Father not the same? | Col 3:17 | BradK | 54528 | ||
Dear luv2study, I'll echo several others comments on the Trinity. Thought it is not found in scripture, the fact of a trine Godhead is so founded. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are ALL refered to as diety and possess attributes of such(God). Just out of curiosity, in one of your previous posts, you refer to 1 Nephi? This is obviously not in the accepted Canon of scripture. Were you using this as extra-biblical support or are you a Mormon? Yours In Christ, BradK |
||||||
1915 | Was it complete? | Bible general Archive 1 | BradK | 54353 | ||
Dea Edb, I'll belatedly echo your support of Hank. He has been and is right on in his proclamation of Gods' word! It is beginning to appear that Grace and Truth is a misnomer. Let me add that ACTION always speaks louder than words. Yours In Christ, BradK |
||||||
1916 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | BradK | 54268 | ||
Dear bubbatate, I don't mind you jumping in in the least. I do concur with the majority of what you said in the spirit in which it was intended. But please don't hear what I'm not saying. Let me clarify. I can't and won't address every point you brought up, for time sake. If you have some specific issues, I'd welcome them as a follow-up though. First off, I may be guilty of not laying a proper foundation to establish a framework in my response you eluded to. It's difficult trying to be succinct and to the point in responding to a Forum member. We risk the possibilty of being misunderstood. We can't always address every possible aspect related to our response so as to prevent any potential for miscommunication. We can all do a better job in communication, for sure. Secondly, there was no attempt to be "proud" about anything in my response. May I suggest leaving out adjectives like this , as they can be viewed as condescending? In no way am I attempting to "fit" anything into my doctrine!( please check out my personal bio if it would be of help) My focus is NOT to promote a particular doctinal bias, be arguementative, or debate matters. On the contary, my purpose for participating in this Forum is to interact in a positive manner, to encourage, edify, and build-up fellow believers. Regarding your accusation about Ps. 119 and my church...? Not true! That's pure conjecture, my friend! You've taken my response TOTALLY out of its' intended context. Can I ask you to kindly refrain from speaking for me or my church?! Remarks like these are exactly what this Forum does not need! Lastly, as far as your final contention that (My) "analysis of what causes confusion and inconsistency is off course by 180 degrees". You are entitled to your opinion, brother. Respectfully Yours In Christ, BradK |
||||||
1917 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | BradK | 53957 | ||
Dear Grace and Truth, I do acknowledge your response and agree with Rom. 15:4. However, we seem to be at an impasse, and that's ok! I'll respectfully end this discussion in the spirit of love. I would like to ask one closing question regarding our eternal security: "Is it based upon the OT promises under the Law or the finality of Christs' atoning death?" Respectfully Yours In Christ, Bradk |
||||||
1918 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | BradK | 53949 | ||
Dear Grace and Truth, I must respectfully, take issue with the "principle" you state from Ezek.18:4-32. I would not go to the OT to find doctrine regarding salvation as a NT Body of Christ member! To do so is to not "rightly divide the word of truth". Ezekiel is NOT written to the Body of Christ, but to the Jews under the Law. Further, they were not indwelt with the Holy Spirit, and Christ had not paid the penalty for their(Israels) sins. You are confusing a very basic issue between Law and Grace. Failure to heed the differences of scripture results in confusion and inconsistency in interpretation. Galatians 3:10-14 my friend! Still speaking the Truth in Love, Bradk |
||||||
1919 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | BradK | 53943 | ||
Dear Grace and Truth, Since you asked, I'll kindly answer. I KNOW that I'm saved (1 John 5:11-13) based upon the all sufficient sacrifice of Christ and His atoning death on the cross. There's no guesswork. In answer to your second question, now we're getting into the realm of supposition. Can a (true) believer really "turn from following the Lord and die in sin"? I don't honestly see any Biblical basis to support this hypothesis. I think the more appropriate question to ask is: "Why would someone who is totally forgiven, In Christ, accepted in the Beloved, blessed with all the spiritual blessings in Christ, a new creation, totally loved, free from condemnation, and complete in Him want to turn from this? I haven't yet figured out how or why this could happen. As I understand scripture(and we may disagree here) my position In Christ is not based upon my walk, but upon His all-sufficient sacrifice! Brother, I hope this helps and explains my position adequately. Speaking the Truth in Love, Bradk |
||||||
1920 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | BradK | 53932 | ||
Dear Grace and Truth, I appreciate your response. Again, maybe some clarification is needed. I concur that Acts 4:32 details the sharing among the believers, leading into Chap. 5 which brings forth the fate of Ananias and Sapphira. However, to directly infer they were "believers" is left unknown. Scripture does not give us a definitive answer. We could assume, but... As far as your references of John 15:16 and Matt. 10:20, I don't believe they are ample to support Judas' being a believer. The chosen apostles are listed in Matt. 10:2,3- with a qualifying note regarding Judas, "the one who betrayed Him". In Matt.10:20 it says,"the Spirit OF your Father SPEAKS in you". I does not say THEY were filled with the Spirit! The Spirit had not yet come, and they were not filled with it. See John 14:16-26! Respectfully Yours, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ] Next > Last [97] >> |