Results 41221 - 41240 of 42010
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions On or After: Wed 02/16/00 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41221 | Jesus earth: God/man or just man? | John 1:14 | zuttione | 3304 | ||
My son's have come under the teaching that while Jesus was here on earth, that he was man, and not God. I believe he was the God/man. What do you think? |
||||||
41222 | Do we always have to debate? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 3288 | ||
The title of this forum is “StudyBible” by Lockman Foundation. Lockman is a trusted name, with an outstanding reputation. As such, one would expect, if they went to a Lockman sponsored site, they would come away with correct answers about the Bible. You can look all through this forum and see unchallenged answers that are based on opinion, half truths and outright lies. I see that as a problem! If this was a Bible Study Forum hosted on some other website I wouldn’t see a problem, I also wouldn’t bother with it, because I would expect it to be full of junk. To me the Lockman name means we are “studying” the inspired Word of God, not Philosophy, not the opinions of man, but the true word of God. I also see it as a “study” not as a debate or an effort to 'one up' someone else. A study is more than just presenting new ideas and challenging each others thinking. A study should have a beginning and reach a conclusion. If not, aren’t we in danger of falling into the trap Paul talked about in 2 Tim. 3:7 “always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” Isn’t our action like those spoke about in Acts 17:21 Now all the Athenians and the strangers visiting there used to spend their time in nothing other than telling or hearing something new. While I don’t advocate censoring, would limiting comments to those that have a Biblical basis be all wrong? Would it go to far to append to an entry the disclaimer, "this person's comments are based on opinions", or that "this answer was based on something other than the inspired Word of God"? When discussions enter realms that aren’t soon to be resolved, would it not be fair to state this subject has been a point of disagreement within the church for years? “Side one” make their stand on these Bible verses and “side two” basis their view on these Bible verses. Where answers are just not possible can that not be so stated with the forewarning that any response given will be the opinion of that person and not the inspired word of God? I think this Bible Study has the potential to become a virtual “Home Group” or “Sunday School Class”. In those environments isn’t there always a moderator or teacher? Isn’t that person's function to direct and lead the group or class in a study not to censor thought, and quench learning? Another function is getting the discussion back on track and to help the group come to some kind of conclusion. Again the stated purpose of this forum was “STUDY” not “debate” and all the things debating brings with it. A discussion doesn’t always have to end with someone wrong and someone right, it can end with people walking away having a better understanding of a differing position, new thoughts on subjects and a new hunger to learn more. I also think everyone that appends to this forum has a responsibility to insure what they are saying is based on the Word of God as written in the Bible. I further believe Lockman Foundation, since they have courageously decided to host this forum, has the added responsibility to insure this forum is not disseminating incorrect or misleading information. I really don't want to beat a dead horse, but I'm very concerned that someone could get a really lousy answer from this forum and believe it is true. I would hate to think someone was deceived maybe even to the point of effecting their salvation by a forum in which I participated. |
||||||
41223 | where the nephilim fallen angels? | Gen 6:4 | mulenga | 3287 | ||
where the nephilim fallen angels? | ||||||
41224 | why is masterbation a sin. | Bible general Archive 1 | victor7827 | 3282 | ||
why is masterbation a sin. | ||||||
41225 | Is fear or doubt unforgivable? | Mark 3:28 | kalos | 3274 | ||
Re the answer: "yes there is and it is called unbelief f...melchizedekau". . . . Dear Brother (or whoever would care to reply): For the record, are you saying that once a person has experienced any fear or doubt, then that person has committed one of many unpardonable sins and can never be forgiven? That he has crossed over the line by doubting or fearing, and will be cast into hell? This is a direct question. It can be answered with a simple yes or no. I am not criticizing your answer. I am merely asking for clarification of your previous answer. I would also note that in my question, the one to which you replied, my entire posting reads as follows: "There is only one unforgivable sin. And it is neither divorce nor suicide." (See Mark 3:28.) . . . So, to what are you referring when you say: "yes there is?" . . . --JVH0212 |
||||||
41226 | God can use woman in the ministry? | Gal 3:28 | reformedreader | 3266 | ||
Elijah, In reference to your statement; "These scriptures have been change in every Bible that I know of, but one, they were change to look as though they were speaking of Jerusalem. This was done through Satins religions as an attempt to keep the women from knowing what they must do and what has to take place just before the end", could you tell me what the original statements were and who precisely changed them and in what translations/documents were they changed? Thanks, Sam Hughey |
||||||
41227 | Favorite Bible study tools? | Bible general Archive 1 | Hank | 3297 | ||
What are your favorite Bible study tools? Or do you not use any? I've found these useful:CONCORDANCES: Strong's (or Crudens) for KJV; NASB Exhaustive (NIV Exhaustive if you use NIV for study and reference)STUDY BIBLES: MacArthur (has NKJV text; Ryrie (available with NASB, KJV, or NIV text); NASB Study Bible (has NASB text with NIV Study Bible notes) published by Zondervan. COMMENTARIES: An excellent and inexpensive one-volume commentary of the entire Bible is "Believer's Bible Commentary" by William MacDonald, published by Thomas Nelson.BIBLE DICTIONARIES: These are so abundant they are weighed, not counted! But investigate before you buy. Some are quite liberal. I like Holman's for general use. It's conservative and has a generous splash of beautiful color photographs of Bible lands.HOW TO BOOKS: Kay Arthur's sound, practical, no-nonsense book, "How To Study Your Bible" can be helpful to just about anyone who wishes to "hide the word in his heart." Hank | ||||||
41228 | Money root of all evil? | 1 Tim 6:10 | Hank | 3259 | ||
You've probably heard "Money is the root of all evil." What's wrong with that statement? What are some of the ways money can be a trap for the believer? Can you cite anyone in the Bible whose money may have come between him and the Lord? [This question is the same as an earlier submission, which contained a goofy typo blunder. Now the secret is out: Hank's not perfect. Sorry to disappoint you!] | ||||||
41229 | Money root of all evil? | 1 Tim 6:10 | Hank | 3258 | ||
You've probably heard "Money is the root of all evil." What's wrong with that statement? What are some of the ways money can be a trap for the believer? Can you cite anyone in the Bible whose money may have become between him and the Lord? | ||||||
41230 | What's the sign? | Matt 24:27 | prayon | 3275 | ||
While talking to His disiples about His return he states that the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken. He then says that the SIGN of the Son of Man will appear in the sky. I have heard tell that this sign is His shakina (sp?) glory. Is this the general concensus? Can anyone elaborate more on this? | ||||||
41231 | What's the sign? | Matt 24:27 | prayon | 3277 | ||
While talking to His disiples about His return he states that the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken. He then says that the SIGN of the Son of Man will appear in the sky. I have heard tell that this sign is His shakina (sp?) glory. Is this the general concensus? Can anyone elaborate more on this? | ||||||
41232 | What's the sign? | Matt 24:30 | prayon | 3279 | ||
While talking to His disiples about His return he states that the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken. He then says that the SIGN of the Son of Man will appear in the sky. I have heard tell that this sign is His shakina (sp?) glory. Is this the general concensus? Can anyone elaborate more on this? | ||||||
41233 | Did Jesus eat unclean foods? | 1 Corinthians | shorty | 3247 | ||
I guess I meant humane treatment of animals raised for food rather than the actual killing process (not to mention the hormones and antibiotics now used in the raising of such animals which raises the question of safety in our consumption of them.) I know Jesus ate fish and he ate lamb (?) at the Passover, but did he eat unclean meat? He declared all food clean in Mark, but why does it never say that he partook of foods now considered clean? | ||||||
41234 | Which Bible versions to stay away from? | Bible general Archive 1 | Makarios | 3234 | ||
If anyone would like to know my opinions on which Bible Versions to 'stay away from', then please email me at archangel76@crosswalkmail.com. I won't list those here as to create strife, but I will list them privately. | ||||||
41235 | real presence? | 1 Cor 11:29 | dschaertel | 3233 | ||
You mention "recognizing the body of the Lord". This sounds like we should take note of the real presence of the Lord's body and blood. Also, you say that "examine himself" means to confess. In the broader context, isn't this scripture about heresy and idol worship? It seems to me that the purpose of this is to tell us we should NOT view the elements in any other way than as the true blood and body of Christ. If we do we eat and drink judgement on ourselves. | ||||||
41236 | Following Moses' Laws | Matt 8:4 | granma_ota | 3231 | ||
In many places, Jesus commanded those He healed to follow the Jewish laws of offerings in regards to their healing. He emphasizes many times that we should follow the laws of Moses. Should we be doing this, even in this day? I don't know about you but I have never taken a lamb or a dove to my church as an offering. And during the woman's cycle when she is considered unclean, should she not go to church? Or after handling a dead body, should a person follow the rituals of purifying before entering the Lord's temple? The clean and unclean meats were done away with by Paul's dream, but what about the rest of the rules? | ||||||
41237 | For debate purposes only | Gen 6:4 | granma_ota | 3230 | ||
Purely for debate purposes, assuming 'sons of God' were angels and since this happened only 120 years before the flood so Noah's family were probably personally aware or acquainted with the offspring, could this have been the 'kernel of truth' which the Greek, Roman and Norse myths of gods were built upon? | ||||||
41238 | How is comunion only symbolic? | 1 Cor 11:29 | dschaertel | 3225 | ||
How cant the idea that the bread and the cup are only symbolic be supported in light of this verse? | ||||||
41239 | How is comunion only symbolic? | 1 Cor 10:16 | dschaertel | 3224 | ||
How can the idea that the bread and cup are only symbolic be supported in light of this verse? | ||||||
41240 | Is a Christian two persons? | Col 3:9 | Lionstrong | 3208 | ||
Does a man become two persons when he becomes a Christian, the old man or self and the new man or self? | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 ] Next > Last [2101] >> |